1898

      Born Tamara Gurwik-Gorska in Warsaw to wealthy, upper-class Polish parents. Her father, Bolris Gorski, was a lawyer with a French firm. Her mother was Malvina Decler.

      1911

      A trip to Italy with her grandmother helps Tamara discover her passion for art.

      1914

      Tamara moves in with her aunt Stephanie in St Petersburg, resenting her mother’s decision to remarry. She meets her future husband, Tadeusz Lempicki, a handsome lawyer from a wealthy Russian family.

      1916

      Tamara and Tadeusz marry in Petrograd in the chapel of the Knights of Malta.

      1917

      Russia is engulfed in revolution after the rise of the Bolsheviks and the new regime.

      1918

      Tadeusz is arrested as a counter-revolutionary. Tamara enlists the help of the Swedish consul to help him escape. They both manage to flee the country and are reunited in Paris, their home for the next 20 years.

      1920

      Birth of Kizette de Lempicka. Tamara takes classes with Maurice Denis and Andre Lhote. She takes the name Tamara de Lempicka and begins to develop her worldly, modish and erotic style.

      1922

      She sells her first paintings from the Gallerie Colette Weill, later exhibiting her work for the first time at the Salon d’Automne in Paris.

      1925

      De Lempicka makes a name for herself with a one woman show at the Bottega di Poesia in Milan and at the world’s first Art Deco exhibition, held in Paris. The German fashion magazine Die Dame commissions one of her most famous paintings, the Self-Portrait in the Green Bugatti.

      1926

      The great Italian poet and playwright, Gabriele d’Annunzio, makes a failed attempt to seduce de Lempicka at his villa on the Italian coastline.

      1927

      De Lempicka completes several controversial paintings of her daughter Kizette. She meets the beautiful Rafaela in the Bois de Boulogne who inspires some of her most sensuous and erotic works.

      1928

      She begins work on her Boucet family commissions and paints a portrait of her husband Tadeusz before their divorce later in the year. She meets Baron Raoul Kuffner and moves into a spacious apartment in rue Méchain designed by the fashionable modernist architect Robert Mallet-Stevens.

      1929

      De Lempicka becomes Kuffner’s mistress and makes her first trip to America.

      1933

      She marries Baron Kuffner. Her work and creativity suffer after the sobering realities of Hitler’s ascension to power in Germany and the Wall Street Crash. She enters a long period of depression.

      1939

      De Lempicka and Baron Kuffner move to America and settle in Los Angeles after Kuffner sells off most of his Austrian and Hungarian estates. De Lempicka continues to paint and slips easily into the glamorous world of Hollywood high society.

      1942

      Tired of their life in Hollywood, Kuffner insists they move back to New York. Kizette joins them in America where she meets her husband, Harold Foxhall, a geologist from Texas.

      1943

      Her new life as a New York socialite detracts from her art. Her figurative paintings and experiments with abstract expressionism fail to attract any interest. Her career begins to stall and she fades slowly into obscurity.

      1962

      Baron Kuffner dies. A distraught de Lempicka moves in with her daughter and husband in Houston.

      1973

      A renewed interest in her work leads to a hugely successful retrospective show of her work at the Galerie du Luxembourg.

      1974

      Her fame restored, she moves in with her daughter in Cuernavaca, Mexico, living the rest of her life marred by her irascibility in her dealings with her family and the rest of the world.

      1980

      Tamara de Lempicka dies on March 18^th leaving instructions for her ashes to be scattered over the crater of the volcano Popocatepetl.

* * *

      Tamara de Lempicka created some of the most iconic images of the twentieth century. Her portraits and nudes of the years 1925–1933 grace the dust jackets of more books than the work of any other artist of her time. Publishers understand that in reproduction, these pictures have an extraordinary power to catch the eye and kindle the interest of the public. In recent years, the originals of the images have fetched record sums at Christie’s and Sotheby’s. Beyond the purchasing power of most museums, these paintings have been eagerly collected by film and pop stars. In May 2004, the Royal Academy of Arts in London staged a major show of de Lempicka’s work just one year after she had figured prominently in another big exhibition of Art Deco at the Victoria and Albert museum.

      The Chinese Man

      c. 1921

      Oil on canvas, 35 × 27 cm

      Musée des Beaux-Arts du Havre

      The public flocked to the show despite a critical reaction of unprecedented hostility towards an artist of such established reputation and market value. In language of moral condemnation hardly used since Hitler’s denunciations of modern art at the Nuremberg rallies and the Nazi-sponsored exhibition of Degenerate Art, the art critic of the Sunday Times, Waldemar Januszczak, fulminated “I had assumed her to be a mannered and shallow peddler of Art Deco banalities. But I was wrong about that. Lempicka was something much worse. She was a successful force for aesthetic decay, a melodramatic corrupter of a great style, a pusher of empty values, a degenerate clown and an essentially worthless artist whose pictures, to our great shame, we have somehow contrived to make absurdly expensive.”

      Woman Wearing a Shawl, in Profile

      c. 1922

      Oil on canvas, 61 × 46 cm

      Barry Friedman Ltd, New York

      According to Januszczak, de Lempicka did not arrive in Paris in 1919 as an innocent refugee from the Russian Revolution but on a sinister mission, intending “an assault on human decency and the artistic standards of her time”. One cannot help wondering what it was about de Lempicka’s art that should bring down upon it such hysterical vituperation. There is a clue perhaps in his waspish observation “Luther Vandross collects her, apparently. Madonna. Streisand. That type.” The hostility is perhaps more politically than aesthetically motivated and what really got under the skin of certain critics was the glamorous life style of Tamara’s collectors as well as of her sitters.

      Bouquet

---

Скачать книгу