Figure 7.4 (a) Intraoperative image of rectal resection and anastomosis. A 1‐ml syringe has been placed within the rectal lumen to provide support to the tissue and to aid in identification of prolapse layers. Stay sutures engaging both layers of the prolapse are present at the dorsal and right lateral aspect of the prolapse. The most dorsal aspect of the prolapsed tissue has been incised to allow anastomosis of the healthy rectal tissue in a simple interrupted pattern. (b) The rectal and anal mucosal anastomosis has been completed with the syringe remaining in place. The stay suture and syringe will be removed allowing the mucosa to invert into the anus.

      Source: Images courtesy of S. Volk and L. Aronson.

Continuation of antibiotics beyond surgery is not indicated. Immediate postoperative care should include appropriate analgesia, such as opioids. Additional supportive care may be required depending on the patient's clinical status. As with all rectal prolapse patients, postoperative patients should be fed a low‐residue diet and treatments geared at the primary disease process instituted. Stool softeners should be avoided unless constipation is a serious concern. Alternatively, psyllium or fiber supplement, may be administered as a bulk forming laxative to help promote normal and comfortable defecation.

      Risks associated with rectal resection and anastomosis include fecal incontinence, incisional leakage or dehiscence, prolapse recurrence, and stricture formation [9]. The risk of stricture formation may be increased in cats, thus circumferential resection and anastomosis has traditionally been discouraged [6].

      Colopexy can be considered for patients that experience a recurrence of rectal prolapse after having received appropriate therapy for any underlying predisposing condition. Prior to colopexy, the prolapse must be reduced. If the prolapse is irreducible or the tissue is compromised, rectal resections and anastomosis should be performed prior to the colopexy procedure.

      Colopexy is most commonly performed through a ventral midline laparotomy. After completing a full abdominal explore, the descending colon is isolated and retracted cranially. While the colon is retracted, a non‐sterile assistant performs a digital rectal exam to confirm complete reduction of the prolapse. Both incisional and non‐incisional colopexy techniques are effective. For a non‐incisional colopexy, the serosa of the anti‐mesenteric surface of the colon is scarified as is the parietal peritoneum where the colon is to be sutured. The colon is then sutured to the left ventrolateral abdominal wall approximately 2.5 cm lateral to the linea alba. A single row of five to six simple interrupted sutures is placed through the peritoneum and then through the anti‐mesenteric surface of the colon. Attempts should be made to engage the submucosa of the colon without entering the lumen with the suture as this may lead to contamination of the colopexy site. For the incisional technique, the seromuscular layer of the colon is incised along the anti‐mesenteric surface and a corresponding incision is made at the proposed colopexy site in the parietal peritoneum. The edges of the two tissues are sutured in a simple interrupted pattern in two rows. Use of both monofilament absorbable and non‐absorbable suture have been described and suture should be sized appropriately for the patient. No difference if efficacy or complications has been reported with either suture type or colopexy technique [10, 11].

Laparoscopic and laparoscopic‐assisted colopexy has been described in dogs and a cat, respectively [12, 13]. For the laparoscopic procedure, a standard three‐cannula technique was used. The peritoneum and serosa were gently abraded using a gauze sponge introduced through a portal and the colopexy was completed by intracorporeal placement of interrupted sutures. Laparoscopic‐assisted colopexy allowed creation of a pexy through a small incision into the left inguinal region of the patient. This procedure is similar to colopexy performed through a limited paramedian approach but allows for intra‐abdominal visualization of the colon prior to incision into the peritoneum. Complications were not reported for either of these procedures.