Essentials of Veterinary Ophthalmology. Kirk N. Gelatt

Читать онлайн книгу.

Essentials of Veterinary Ophthalmology - Kirk N. Gelatt


Скачать книгу
Structure Refractive index Refractive power (D) Reference Tears 1.336 43.0a Montes‐Mico et al. (2004) Cornea 1.376 42.3a Duke‐Elder (1970); Naeser et al. (2016) Anterior surface 1.401 48.2 Patel et al. (1995) Posterior surface 1.373 −5.9 Patel et al. (1995) Lens 1.41 21.9 Duke‐Elder (1970); Chang et al. (2017) Anterior surface 8.4 Millodot (1982) Posterior surface 14.0 Millodot (1982) Vitreous/aqueous 1.336 Duke‐Elder (1970) Retina 1.363 Millodot (1982)

      a The refractive power of the cornea and tears is not additive. Rather, that of the former arises from the latter, and from its interface with air. The net power of the tears and the anterior and posterior cornea is 43 D.

      Lens

      As noted, the refraction that occurs as light passes from the cornea into the AH and during its passage through the aqueous has little overall significance. Therefore, the next significant refractive structure through which light passes after the cornea is the lens. As in the case of the cornea, the refractive power of the lens is determined by both its refractive index and its curvature. In humans and in many nonaquatic species, the refractive index of the lens nucleus is about 1.41; it decreases gradually toward the cortex, forming a bell‐shaped refractive index curve known as the gradient index. In humans, the calculated refractive power of the lens is approximately 22 D.

      Vitreous

Species Axial length (mm) Corneal power (D) References
Goldfish 4.2 129 (in air) Hughes (1977)
Rat 6.3 112.7 Hughes (1977)
Chicken 8.9 108 Cohen et al. (2008)
Guinea pig 8.9 83.9 Howlett & McFadden (2007)
Sea otter 14.0 59.2 Murphy et al. (1990)
Rhesus monkey (4 months) 16.3 56 Qiao‐Grider et al. (2010)
Rabbit 18.0 44.6 Hughes (1977); Wang et al. (2014)
Cat 21.3 43.0 Habib et al. (1995)
Dog 19.5–21.9 37.8–43.2a Gaiddon et al. (1991); Nelms et al. (1994); Rosolen et al. (1995)
Ostrich 38/0 25.3 Martin et al. (2001)
Elephant 38.8 21.3 Murphy et al. (1992a)
Horse 39.2 16.5 McMullen & Gilger (2006)
43.7 15.7–19.5 Farrall & Handscombe (1990); Miller & Murphy (2017)

      a The range of values in the dog probably reflects a breed difference, because larger breeds have flatter corneas.

      Accommodation


Скачать книгу