The Politics of Incremental Progressivism. Группа авторов
Читать онлайн книгу.
K. (2000). O cotidiano da política. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
61 Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20 (1): 1–21.
62 Lefebvre, C. (2010). Metropolis ingobernables? Experiencias Europeas. Politica y Sociedad 47 (3): 131–143.
63 Le Galès, P. (2011). Urban policies in Europe: what is governed? In: The New Blackwell Companion to the City (eds. G. Bridge and S. Watson), 747–758. Oxford: Blackwel.
64 Le Galès, P. (2020). Rendre la métropole parisienne gouvernable – état, institutions, réseaux. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
65 Levitsky, S. and Roberts, K. (2011). The Resurgence of the Latin America Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
66 Limongi, F. and Mesquita, L. (2011). Estratégia partidária e clivagens eleitorais: as eleições municipais pós redemocratização. In: São Paulo: novos percursos e atores (eds. L. Kowarick and E. Marques), 207–232. São Paulo: Editora 34.
67 Lopez, T. (1996). Gobiernos municipales en México: entre la modernización y la tradicion política. Tijuana: El Colegio de la frontera norte.
68 Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.
69 Marques, E. (2003). Redes sociais, instituições e atores políticos no governo da cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: Annablume.
70 Marques, E. (2012). Public policies, power and social networks in Brazilian urban policies. Latin American Research Review 47 (2): 27–50.
71 Marques, E. (ed.) (2016a). São Paulo in the Twenty‐First Century Spaces, Heterogeneities, Inequalities. New York: Routledge.
72 Marques, E. (2016b). De volta aos capitais para melhor entender as políticas urbanas. Novos Estudos 35 (2): 15–33.
73 Marques, E. (2017). Em busca de um objeto esquecido: a política e as políticas do urbano no brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 32 (95): 1–18.
74 Marques, E. (2019). Transformações, avanços e impasses nas políticas urbanas brasileiras recentes. In: As políticas da política: desigualdades e inclusão nos governos do PSDB e do PT (eds. M. Arretche, E. Marques and C. Faria), 245–268. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp/CEM.
75 McLennan, A. and Munslow, B. (2009). The Politics of Service Delivery. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
76 Meltzer, A. and Richard, S. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89: 914–927.
77 Molotch, H. (1976). The City as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. The American Journal of Sociology 82 (2): 309–332.
78 Novaes, L. (2018). Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 84–98.
79 Oliveros, V. (2016). Making it personal: clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics 48 (3): 373–391.
80 Paller, J. (2015). Informal networks and access to power to obtain housing in urban slums in Ghana. Africa Today 62 (1): 30–55.
81 Palmer, I., Moodley, N., and Parnell, S. (2017). Building a Capable State: Service Delivery in Post‐Apartheid South Africa. London: Zed books.
82 Pasotti, E. (2010a). Sorting through the trash: the waste management crisis in southern Italy. South European Society and Politics 15 (2): 289–307.
83 Pasotti, E. (2010b). Political Branding in Cities: The Decline of Machine Politics in Bogotá, Naples, and Chicago. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84 Peterson, P. (1982). The City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85 Pickvance, C. (2001). Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16: 7–28.
86 Pierre, J. (2011). The Politics of Urban Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
87 Post, A. (2014). Foreign and Domestic Investment in Argentina: The Politics of Privatized Infrastructure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88 Post, A. (2019). Cities and politics in the developing world. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 115–133.
89 Raco, M., Durrant, D., and Livingstone, N. (2018). Slow cities, urban politics and the temporalities of planning: lessons from London. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (7): 1176–1194.
90 Reddy, V. and Rao, R. (1985). Urban Crisis in India. Hyderabad: Hyderabad Publishers.
91 Rhodes, R. (2007). Understanding governance: ten years on. Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264.
92 Rivadulla, M. (2012). Clientelism or something else? Squatter politics in Montevideo. Latin American Politics and Society 54 (1): 37–63.
93 Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23.
94 Rocha, M. and Silva, B. (2017). O poder de indicar: preferências legislativas de vereadores mineiros. Cadernos Adenauer XVIII (2): 185–208.
95 Rolnik, R. (2009). Democracia no fio da navalha limites e possibilidades para a implementação de uma agenda de reforma urbana no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos 21 (2): 30–50.
96 Roy, A. (2016). Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1): 200–208.
97 Roy, A. and Al Sayyad, N. (eds.) (2004). Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, South Asia and Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
98 Ruchelman, L. (1969). Big City Mayors: The Crisis in Urban Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
99 Sabatier, P. and Jenkins‐Smith, H. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
100 Santos, W. (1979). Cidadania e justiça. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Campus.
101 Sapotichne, J., Jones, B., and Wolfe, M. (2007). Is urban politics a black hole? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 43: 76–92.
102 Scott, A. (2012). A World in Emergence: Cities and Regions in the 21st Century. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.
103 Scott, A. and Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1): 1–15.
104 SEADE. (2019). São Paulo 465 anos. São Paulo: Seade. http://www.seade.gov.br/wp‐content/uploads/2019/02/Municipio_Sao_Paulo_.pdf (accessed at 16 June 2020).
105 Sellers, J. (2010). State‐society relations beyond the Weberian state. In: Handbook of Governance (ed. M. Bevir), 124–141. London: Sage.
106 Sellers, J. (2019). From within to between nations: subnational comparison across borders. Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 85–105.
107 Sellers, J. and Kwak, S. (2010). State and society in local governance: lessons from a multilevel comparison. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (3): 620–643.
108 Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
109 Stewart, F. (1950). A Half Century of Municipal Reform. the History of the National Municipal League. Berkeley: University of California Press.
110 Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50: 17–28.
111 Stokes, S., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112 Stone, C. (1993). Urban regimes