Wetland Carbon and Environmental Management. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн книгу.

Wetland Carbon and Environmental Management - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Wetlands (Inland) 319,000 23.89 7,610

      An analysis of CONUS wetland class change shows the approximate amount of sequestered soil carbon vulnerable to changes in land use. The loss of wetlands to agriculture and development is explored in this chapter through an analysis of Sleeter et al. (2018) on contemporary land use change. From 1974 to 2007, nearly 17,000 km2 of CONUS land transferred into or out of an inland wetland classification, with a net loss of nearly 5,000 km2 of inland CONUS wetland area.

      Some of the changes documented by Sleeter et al. (2018) are due to changes in moisture availability. For example, droughts in the late 1980s and early 1990s followed by a rapid change from drought to wet conditions in 1993 (Huang et al., 2011) resulted in the wettest period seen in study area in North Dakota in 130 years (Winter & Rosenberry, 1998). Much of the change in wetland land cover may be due to natural wetland expansion and contraction due to changes in soil moisture. It is common for some wetlands, including prairie pothole wetlands, to expand during wet years and contract in dry years. These wetlands are linked by groundwater hydrology or aboveground flow, and may even be combined during wet periods. One such period was from 1993 to 1998, when record high ground and surface water levels were recorded due to high precipitation. These wet‐dry cycles (also called oscillatory fluctuations) are common and have been documented over thousands of years in prairie pothole wetlands through proxy data such as tree rings. These cycles can cause changes in species presence and abundance and occur over long periods of time, estimated to range from 4–35 years (Valk, 2005). Moisture trends may be caused in part by increased snowmelt and warmer air temperatures in the Prairie Pothole region (McKenna et al., 2017).

Year Percent of CONUS Area Burned Percent of Wetland Area Burned Total Burned Area km2 Wetland Burned Area km2 Wetland Burned Area as Percent of Total Burned Area
1984 0.08 0.06 5,600 300 4.42
1990 0.23 0.44 15,700 1,900 12.24
2000 0.72 0.78 52,700 3,400 6.45
2011 0.85 1.0 62,000 4,400 7.03
2015 0.37 0.27 27,100 1,200 4.33

      Burned areas were determined through MTBS.

      Wildfires are a regular feature of many wetland ecosystems in the United States, such as pine barrens (Clark et al., 2006), pocosins (Bailey et al., 2007), northern spruce peatlands (Granath et al., 2016), and Alaskan lowlands (Jafarov et al., 2013). Charcoal, a type of pyrolyzed or black carbon, can be seen in cores taken from peatland cores in the Southeast, Midwest, and boreal regions, indicating a long‐standing fire history in these areas (Neary et al., 2005). Fires in Alaskan wetlands can be particularly destructive, as fires that burn the organic soil layer can destabilize or permanently thaw permafrost (Jafarov et al., 2013). The largest fire in CONUS began in the Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia in 2007 and is one of more than 300 fires that have burned there since 1937, demonstrating that fire is a long‐standing part of this ecosystem (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fire Management, 2020). Although fire can release stored carbon and threaten developed areas and some animals, it is an important component of the ecosystem with many regulatory benefits.

      Wetland fires have complex relationships to wetland hydrology, including changes to soil moisture and aeration. Fire frequency may change between wetlands with different hydroperiods, with long hydroperiods associated with more frequent fires. Although the relationship between hydroperiod and fire regime is complex, and may also involve vegetation type and SOC content, longer hydroperiods are also associated with wetlands containing more organic soils. Wetlands that are unable to drain due to frozen soils may see more SOC bunt in fires occurring later in the season, after drainage. Fire type is also key, with differences between fires that burn surface vegetation versus fires which burn underground and remove carbon from the soil – this second type is common in wetlands with lower water tables (Neary et al., 2005).

      Source: Based on Eidenshink et al., 2007.


Скачать книгу
Fire Type Wetland Burned Area km2 Total Burned Area km2 Wetland Burned Area as Percent of Total Burned Area
Other 6,800 76,900 8.84