Active Electrical Distribution Network. Группа авторов
Читать онлайн книгу.
activities and social responsiveness that are essential for the betterment of all the stakeholders. A unit name TRC (Trade and Retail Cell) under SNE takes care of all the tasks related to power trading and retailing. Similarly, awareness dissemination programs, media advertisements, publications, etc., are being done through an AAC (Awareness and Advertisement Cell) of the SNE. Other important tasks of the SNE include consumer rankings that ensure efficient use of electricity by creating tariff differences between efficient and inefficient consumers.
1.4.4.4 TI
The TI (Training Institute) has the essential responsibility of providing technical, financial, legal, and managerial training across various nodes of the distribution sector, which ensures an improved decision-making capability. TI may also help toward publications, collaborations, policy formulations, technical planning, plan execution monitoring, performance evaluation, and many other research-related activities.
1.5 Conclusion
The present study applies the business model concept to investigate how different models of power distribution fit themselves to be suitable for the requirements of a smart grid. Different business models have evolved across the globe to analyze the power distribution function. Based on the analysis, related concerns with a particular model have been sorted. A surprising result is that most of the adopted models are not suitable to accommodate the undergoing changes that are taking place as a result of smart grid implementations.
A clear result shows that it is necessary for the distribution utilities to strengthen their business model innovation capabilities to cope with the growing challenges. If a utility fails to adapt a suitable business model, it becomes difficult for the utility to transition from a traditional grid to a smart grid. Therefore, it becomes an inevitable task for the distribution utilities to innovate and adapt a suitable business model that ensures adequate infrastructural development in terms of basic electrical infrastructure, metering infrastructure, communication infrastructure, and IT infrastructure. Apart from this, an organization structure is also needed for management and maintenance works as well as control and operation-related tasks. Creating a mindset open to business model innovation could help utilities to overcome the various challenges under a smart grid environment. The research also has some implications for policy makers, regulators, and energy consultants.
The new business model is expected to overcome all the different challenges (as discussed in previous sections) faced by presently widely accepted and planned business models. Apart from this, separation of different activities into distinct businesses will lead to the following benefits:
Create an opportunity for all different small players who are sound in technology related to the power business.
Will ensure a competitive environment across various stages of power distribution.
Will create huge job opportunities.
Open a new business in the field of education and training.
Tariff rates will be reduced.
Ensure improved power quality.
Ensure system stability and reliability.
Not only big players but also other small players will get a chance to participate in business.
Will attract many other expertise companies like IT, communication, insurance, trading, BPOs, etc., toward the power business.
BPOs are paying huge salaries to employees and people because of their ideas. Thus, by attracting BPOs for participation in the distribution sector, intelligent people are being accommodated in the sector.
It will help in promoting renewable-based distributed generations.
Promote the needs and importance of the micro grid.
Will bring down the level of AT&C loss within acceptable limits.
Attract attention toward loss reduction apart from operation and maintenance.
Create motivation for DSM-related activities.
Automatic realization of ABR.
This model suits both urban and rural areas in the context that some models are not suited for rural implementation.
References
1 [1] B. Khan, G. Agnihotri, and A.S. Mishra, “An approach for transmission loss and cost allocation by loss allocation index and co-operative game theory,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, vol. 97, pp. 41–46, 2016.
2 [2] B. Khan, G. Agnihotri, S.E. Mubeen, and G. Naidu, “A TCSC incorporated power flow model for embedded transmission usage and loss allocation,” AASRI Journal Elsevier, vol. 7, pp. 45–50, 2014. ISSN: 2212-6716.
3 [3] B. Khan, G. Agnihotri, G. Gupta, and P. Rathore, “A power flow tracing based method for transmission usage, loss and reliability margin allocation,” AASRI Journal Elsevier, vol. 7, pp. 94–100, 2014.
4 [4] B. Khan, G. Agnihotri, P. Rathore, A. Mishra, and G. Naidu, “A cooperative game theory approach for usage and reliability margin cost allocation under contingent restructured market,” International Review of Electrical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 854–862, 2014.
5 [5] P. Rathore, G. Agnihotri, B. Khan, and G. Gupta, “Transmission pricing scheme under contingency conditions in open access market,” 2014 Eighteenth National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Guwahati, pp. 1–6, 2014.
6 [6] T. Jamasb, T. Thakur, and B. Bag, “Smart electricity distribution networks, business models and application for developing countries,” Energy Policy, vol. 114, March 2018, pp. 22–29, 2017, Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.068.
7 [7] D.P. Sharma, P.S.C. Nair, and R. Balasubramanian, “Performance of Indian power sector during a decade under restructuring: A critique,” Energy Policy, vol. 33, pp. 563–576, 2005.
8 [8] Task Force. “Report on private participation in power distribution, planning commission,” Government of India, 2012, [Online]. Available at: www.infrastructure.gov.in.
9 [9] T. Thakur, B. Bag, and S. Prakash, “A critical review of franchisee model in electricity distribution sector in India,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 15–21, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2017.05.001.
10 [10] J. Roman, T. Gomez, A. Munoz, and J. Peco, “Regulation of distribution network business,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 662–669, April 1999.
11 [11] D. Gutschow and M.O. Kachieng’a, “Making business sense of distribution automation systems: The case of Eskom, South Africa,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 272–278, February 2005.
12 [12] J. Medina, N. Muller, and I. Roytelman, “Demand response and distribution grid operations: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–198, September 2010.
13 [13]