Encyclopedia of Renewable Energy. James G. Speight
Читать онлайн книгу.
occurs and the bed must be discarded and the use of several beds in series is not usually economical. Removal of larger amounts of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams requires continuous processes, such as the Ferrox process or the Stretford process.
The Ferrox process is based on the same chemistry as the iron oxide process except that it is fluid and continuous. The Stretford process employs a solution containing vanadium salts and anthraquinone disulfonic acid.
Most hydrogen sulfide removal processes involve fairly simple chemistry with the potential for regeneration with return of the hydrogen sulfide. However, if the quantity involved does not justify installation of a sulfur recovery plant, usually a Claus plant, it will be necessary to select a process which produces elemental sulfur directly:
The conversion can be achieved by reacting the hydrogen sulfide gas directly with air in a burner reactor if the gas can be burnt with a stable flame.
Other equilibria which should be taken into account are the formation of sulfur dimer, hexamer, and octamer as well as the dissociation of hydrogen sulfide:
Carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide may be formed, especially when the gas is burned with less than the stoichiometric amount of air in the presence of hydrocarbon impurities or large amounts of carbon dioxide.
Equilibrium conversion is almost complete (approximately 99 to 100%) at relatively low temperatures and diminishes at first at higher temperatures, in accordance with the exothermic nature of the reaction. A further rise in temperature causes the equilibrium conversion to increase again. This is a consequence of the dissociation of the polymeric sulfur into monatomic sulfur.
Catalysis by alumina is necessary to obtain good equilibrium conversions: the thermal Claus reaction is fast only above 500°C (930°F). There is also a lower temperature limit which is not caused by low rates but by sulfur condensation in the catalyst pores and consequent deactivation of the catalyst. The lower limit at which satisfactory operation is still possible depends on the pore size and size distribution of the catalyst; with alumina-based catalysts having wide pores, the conversion proceeds satisfactorily at approximately 200°C (390°F).
In all Claus process configurations several conversion steps in adiabatic reactors are used, with intermittent and final condensation of the sulfur produced. There are three main process forms, depending on the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and other sulfur compounds in the gas to be converted, i.e., the straight-through, the split-flow oxidation process.
The straight-through process is applicable when the gas stream contains more than 50% v/v hydrogen sulfide. Feed gases of this type can be burnt with the stoichiometric amount of air to give sulfur. The combustion reactor is followed by a combined waste heat boiler and sulfur condenser from which liquid sulfur and steam are obtained. The gases are then reheated by in-line fuel combustion to the temperature of the first catalytic convertor, which is usually kept at approximately 350°C (660°F) to decompose any carbonyl sulfide and any carbon disulfide formed in the combustion step. A second catalytic convertor, operating at as low a temperature as possible, is also employed to obtain high final conversions.
Molecular sieves and membranes have been undergoing development for the removal of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide from gas streams, especially when the amount of the acid gas(es) is low. The most appropriate use of the sieves and the membranes would be use of the sieve to selectively remove hydrogen sulfide and/or use of membranes permeable to hydrogen sulfide but not to carbon dioxide.
See also: Gas Cleaning, Gas Processing, Gas Treating.
Acid Gas Removal Processes
The primary process for sweetening sour gas streams is similar to the processes of glycol dehydration and removal of gas stream liquids by absorption. In this case, however, amine (olamine) solutions are used to remove the hydrogen sulfide (the amine process). The sour gas is run through a tower, which contains the olamine solution.
There are two principle amine solutions used, monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA). Either of these compounds, in liquid form, will absorb sulfur compounds from the gas stream as it passes through. The effluent gas is virtually free of sulfur compounds, and thus loses its sour gas status; the amine solution used can be regenerated for reuse.
Although most sour gas sweetening involves the amine absorption process, it is also possible to use solid desiccants like iron sponge to remove hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide. Treatment of gas to remove the acid gas constituents (hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide) is most often accomplished by contact of the gas stream with an alkaline solution. The most commonly used treating solutions are aqueous solutions of the ethanolamine or alkali carbonates.
A considerable number of other treating agents have been developed in recent years. Most of these newer treating agents rely upon physical absorption and chemical reaction. When only carbon dioxide is to be removed in large quantities or when only partial removal is necessary, a hot carbonate solution or one of the physical solvents is the most economical selection.
The most well-known hydrogen sulfide removal process is based on the reaction of hydrogen sulfide with iron oxide (often also called the iron sponge process or the dry box method) in which the gas is passed through a bed of wood chips impregnated with iron oxide.
The iron oxide process is the oldest and still the most widely used batch process for sweetening gas streams and separation the gas liquids. The process was implemented during the 19th century. In the process, the sour gas is passed down through the bed. In the case where continuous regeneration is to be utilized a small concentration of air is added to the sour gas before it is processed. This air serves to continuously regenerate the iron oxide, which has reacted with hydrogen sulfide, which serves to extend the on-stream life of a given tower but probably serves to decrease the total amount of sulfur that a given weight of bed will remove.
The process is usually best applied to gases containing low to medium concentrations (300 ppm) of hydrogen sulfide or mercaptans. This process tends to be highly selective and does not normally remove significant quantities of carbon dioxide. As a result, the hydrogen sulfide stream from the process is high purity. The use of iron sponge process for sweetening sour gas is based on adsorption of the acid gases on the surface of the solid sweetening agent followed by chemical reaction of ferric oxide (Fe2O3) with hydrogen sulfide:
The reaction requires the presence of slightly alkaline water and a temperature below 43°C (110°F) and bed alkalinity (pH = 8 to 10) should be checked regularly, usually on a daily basis. The pH level is be maintained through the injection of caustic soda with the water. If the gas does not contain sufficient water vapor, water may need to be injected into the inlet gas stream.
The ferric sulfide produced by the reaction of hydrogen sulfide with ferric oxide can be oxidized with air to produce sulfur and regenerate the ferric oxide:
The regeneration step is exothermic and air must be introduced slowly so the heat of reaction can be dissipated. If air is introduced quickly the heat of reaction may ignite the bed. Some of the elemental sulfur produced in the regeneration step remains in the bed. After several cycles, this sulfur will form a cake over the ferric oxide, decreasing the reactivity of the bed. Typically, after 10 cycles the bed must be removed and a new bed introduced into the vessel.
The iron oxide process is one of several metal oxide-based processes that scavenge hydrogen sulfide and organic sulfur compounds (mercaptans) from gas streams through reactions with the solid based chemical adsorbent. They are typically non-regenerable, although some are partially regenerable, losing activity upon each regeneration cycle.