The United States vs. China. C. Fred Bergsten

Читать онлайн книгу.

The United States vs. China - C. Fred Bergsten


Скачать книгу
be counterproductive as it would simply motivate China to push even harder to achieve economic superiority, and America’s traditional allies to tilt increasingly toward the rising power.

      The United States, along with its traditional allies, should instead pursue a policy of “conditional competitive cooperation,” through which it would seek to work informally but cooperatively with the rising superpower to lead a stable and prosperous world economy. Competition would characterize the day-to-day interactions between the two economies. Conditionality would require both countries to implement the leadership commitments they make to each other and to fulfill their international obligations more broadly. The other key countries, especially the Europeans and Japanese, would be integrated into the process as well.

      Systemic cooperation will probably require modifications in the international rules and institutions to satisfy Chinese preferences. It will certainly accord China a larger voice in international decision-making circles. But the essential “conditional” part of the strategy will require China to significantly alter policies and practices of its own that undermine, and thus jeopardize, the relatively open trade and investment regime on which China itself, as well as the United States, depends so heavily.

      Many studies of China’s rise, of course, include its economic dimension. So do many analyses of China – United States relations. But very few have focused primarily on the economic aspects of these issues, including whether it would be feasible or desirable to decouple them from the even more contentious security and political dimensions of the relationship – rather than to decouple the United States and China more broadly.

      Fewer studies still have been devoted to the implications of the competition for the functioning of the global economic order. That system was created under US leadership at the end of the Second World War and has underpinned both the stunning economic progress and the “long peace” among the great powers that characterized the succeeding 75 years. Does rising China seek revolutionary or merely revisionist changes in that order? This book attempts to fill these gaps from the perspective of the United States, China, and the international economic system as a whole.

      The book is divided into three parts. The first two chapters set the stage by analyzing the challenges facing the global economic order due to the rising capabilities of a new superpower and the declining will of the incumbent leader; the current and prospective global positions of those two superpowers; and the meaning and requirements of global economic leadership. The next four chapters examine the capability and will of China and the United States, respectively, to exercise such leadership.

      The following three chapters assess the possible systemic alternatives: a G-0 world with no effective leader at all, which could turn out to be either stable (G-0s) or unstable (G-0u); a new G-1 “with Chinese characteristics” that might involve a Chinese “dash for dominance”; and a G-2 based on systemic co-leadership between the superpowers. Chapter 10 closes with conclusions and recommendations for a policy of conditional competitive cooperation, advocating policy steps to seek a G-0s in the short run, and an informal but effective G-2 over the longer term.

      My acknowledgments begin with my colleagues at the Institute, many of whom provided invaluable comments and insights on succeeding versions of the manuscript through several seminars and innumerable brainstorming sessions. Special thanks go to Nicholas Lardy, one of the world’s leading experts on the Chinese economy; Ted Truman, with his enormous experience with global economic governance; Jeffrey Schott, our expert on the crucial trade policy aspects of the issue; Steve Weisman, Vice President for Communications and Publications, who provided moral support and wise guidance throughout; and Adam Posen, my successor as CEO who strongly encouraged the project from its outset. My particular gratitude is extended to the Smith Richardson Foundation, which provided initial funding.

      I am particularly grateful to the members of the Study Group that the Institute convened for the project. My greatest appreciation goes to those who read all or parts of earlier drafts of the manuscript: Thomas Christensen, the late Richard N. Cooper, Joseph Nye, David Shambaugh, Robert Zoellick (in addition to Lardy, Schott, and Truman), and three very conscientious anonymous reviewers.

       C. Fred BergstenSenior Fellow and Director EmeritusPeterson Institute for International Economics August 2021

      1 1. The recent conclusions of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) of 11 nations, and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) of 15, mean that more than half of APEC’s original goal has now been achieved – without the United States.


Скачать книгу