Computational Geomechanics. Manuel Pastor

Читать онлайн книгу.

Computational Geomechanics - Manuel Pastor


Скачать книгу
asterisk Baseline EndFraction identical-to upper C Subscript s Baseline plus StartFraction italic n upper S Subscript w Baseline Over upper K Subscript f Baseline EndFraction plus StartFraction left-parenthesis alpha minus n right-parenthesis chi Subscript w Baseline Over upper K Subscript s Baseline EndFraction"/>

      which, of course, must be identical with (2.17) when Sw = 1 and χw = 1, i.e. when we have full saturation. The above modification is mainly due to an additional term to those defining the increased storage in (2.17). This term is due to the changes in the degree of saturation and is simply:

      (2.31)n StartFraction normal d upper S Subscript w Baseline Over normal d t EndFraction

      but here we introduce a new parameter CS defined as

      (2.32)n StartFraction normal d upper S Subscript w Baseline left-parenthesis p Subscript w Baseline right-parenthesis Over italic d t EndFraction equals n StartFraction normal d upper S Subscript w Baseline left-parenthesis p Subscript w Baseline right-parenthesis Over normal d p Subscript w Baseline EndFraction StartFraction normal d p Subscript w Baseline Over normal d t EndFraction equals upper C Subscript s Baseline ModifyingAbove p With ampersand c period dotab semicolon Subscript w

      The final elimination of w in a manner identical to that used when deriving (2.21) gives (neglecting density variation):

      (2.33a)left-parenthesis k Subscript italic i j Baseline left-parenthesis minus p Subscript w comma j Baseline minus upper S Subscript w Baseline rho Subscript f Baseline ModifyingAbove u With two-dots Subscript j Baseline plus upper S Subscript w Baseline rho Subscript f Baseline b Subscript j Baseline right-parenthesis right-parenthesis Subscript comma i Baseline plus alpha ModifyingAbove epsilon With ampersand c period dotab semicolon Subscript italic i i Baseline plus StartFraction ModifyingAbove p With ampersand c period dotab semicolon Over upper Q Superscript asterisk Baseline EndFraction plus ModifyingAbove s With ampersand c period dotab semicolon Subscript 0 Baseline equals 0

      or

      The small changes required here in the solution process are such that we found it useful to construct our computer program for the partially saturated form, with the fully saturated form being a special case.

      In the time‐stepping computation, we still always assume that the parameters Sw, kw, and Cs change slowly and hence we will compute these at the start of the time interval keeping them subsequently constant.

      Previously, we mentioned several typical cases where pressure can become negative and hence saturation drops below unity. One frequently encountered example is that of the flow occurring in the capillary zone during steady‐state seepage. The solution to the problem can, of course, be obtained from the general equations simply by neglecting all acceleration and fixing the solid displacements at zero (or constant) values.

p Subscript w Baseline equals 0 and w Subscript n Baseline equals 0 left-parenthesis normal i period normal e period n e t zero inflow right-parenthesis

      Clearly, both conditions cannot be simultaneously satisfied and it is readily concluded that only the second is true above the area where the flow emerges. Of course, when the flow leaves the free surface, the reverse is true.

Schematic illustration of test example of partially saturated flow experiment by Liakopoulos.

      Source: From Liakopoulos (1965)

      In the practical code used for earthquake analysis, we shall use this partially saturated flow to calculate a wide range of soil mechanics phenomena. However, for completeness in Section 2.4, we shall show how the effects of air movement can be incorporated into the analysis.

      2.4.1 The Governing Equations Including Air Flow

      This part of the chapter is introduced for completeness – though the effects of the air pressure are insignificant in most problems. However, in some cases of consolidation and confined materials, the air pressures play an important role and it is useful to have means for their prediction. Further, the procedures introduced are readily applicable to other pore–fluid mixtures. For instance, the simultaneous presence of water and oil is important in some areas of geomechanics and coupled problems are of importance in the treatment of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The procedures used in the analysis follow precisely the same lines as introduced here.

      In particular, the treatment following the physical approach used in this chapter has been introduced by Simoni and Schrefler (1991), Li et al. (1990)


Скачать книгу