Preface

      The origins of electrospinning technology dates back to the days when Jean‐Antoine Nollett first electrosprayed water with an electric charge generated from a Leyden Jar, back in 1746. But it was not until 1902 that Cooley filed the first patent on electrospinning based on that process. It took yet another half a century before Geoffrey Taylor in 1969 modeled the deformation of a liquid droplet in an electric field as the Taylor's cone. Electrospinning of nanofibers has come a long way since then, thanks to the intensive burst of research since the 1990s when academia got interested in the process. Today, it is a popular and versatile technology with several books published on electrospinning in recent years, including The Science and Technology of Polymer Nanofibers (Wiley 2008) by one of the present editors. Nanofiber science has made impressive advances and recently discovered a myriad of applications for this unique nanomaterial. Most of these developments occurred during the last two to three decades of research; the term “electrospinning” itself came into common use only as recently as 1995. Among the many different routes to fabricating nanofibers, electrospinning remains the most popular because of its simplicity, low‐cost, and scalability. By definition, nanofibers are 1‐D nanomaterials that have diameterd <100 nm. While there is scientific and regulatory agreement on this size range, many research publications as well as some regulatory organizations accommodate an upper limit of a d = 1000 nm. Electrospinning is able to fabricate nanofibers that fall within both size ranges.

The singular property that makes nanofibers so useful is their very high specific surface area. For instance, at a fiber diameter of 500 nm, the surface area per gram of resin can reach a 1000 m² that is larger than the floor area of two basketball courts. Compared to other nanogeometries such as thin films, this allows for relatively faster interaction of nanofibers with chemicals, particles, or live cells in applications such as chemical sensors, high‐efficiency filters, biomedical scaffolding applications, and faster release of bioactive compounds in controlled‐release applications. Sub‐100 nm nanofibers, such as those of carbon, display unique quantum size effects, obtain exceptional strength, and high conductivity. Spider drag‐line silk¹, naturally occurring nanofibers that are ~20 nm in size diameter, display a tensile modulus of 10.6 (GPa) at 25% RH. Optimized nanofibers for specific applications are usually doped with other molecules, coated with an active material or might be a nanofilled composite material. Also, electrospun fiber mats allow easy handling of the nanofibers in different application and their high porosity helps easier access of reactants to fiber surface functionalities. Industrially relevant nanofiber materials fall into four broad classes: (i) carbon nanofibers; (ii) polymer nanofibers; (iii) inorganic nanofibers; and (iv) composite nanofibers. All four classes of these can be made in the laboratory by electrospinning of a composition where the crucial component for fiber‐forming is a polymer. Over 50 different types of polymers have been electrospun up to date, and it is safe to assume that conditions allowing electrospinning of almost any polymer can be identified. Incorporating oxides, especially ZnO, TiO₂, SnO₂, and Al₂·O₃ in nanofibers has been reported in nanofibers in recent literature.

      The promise of nanofibers as a particularly useful material of the future is justified because of several observations. The first has to do with the incredible diversity of nanofiber morphologies fabricated under careful conditions. These include exotic configurations including multichannel fibers where the lacuna is divided into two to five sections, tube in tube nanofibers, core–shell nanofibers, nanowire in nanotube structures, and nanodots