Leader. 3 part. Maikl Sosnin
Читать онлайн книгу.
difference is clear.
Yes, but for what you manage other you pay the money.
And for the fact that you operate a money do not pay.
And this is another indicator of leadership.
It is more difficult to do what is important to you.
You know, I really like the example of the Minister.
Its like they asked in an interview what he loves to do most.
And he said that he was born in the village (it is clear) and the most favorite place is the river and where he caught a pike.
You can even comprehend the difference?
Minister of a country such as Russia, and fishing on the river in the village.
For what you pay you minister.
For what you catch fish there.
But you can be more important than fishing.
Answer for yourself – what is more important to you.
Because these things determine the life.
They decide who will go to you next.
A woman whose husband is important minister did not go to the country probably.
And that it is important that the quiet life is not clear where all will go to the big city and especially to participate in all these endless get-togethers in the Kremlin and other places.
You can say that it is important for people when they passed this stage.
A woman who somehow knew that her important basic things where she can feel its nature will never part with them.
And man, too, if the brain is not fully owned by the public who wishes to eat it, he also did not understand why all this is necessary.
There are people who value science.
Science in its true sense.
Without implementation.
Theoretical Science.
Science is going on in the halls of research institutions and academies of science.
Around always turns a lot of people of so-called experts.
They want to implement this knowledge in practice.
But they scientists?
If they are a notch or two below the real scientists?
If you want to celebrate this power is not science.
If you want to earn money for scientific discovery is even lower.
And if you’re just wondering what’s inside an atom say.
And what will happen if we look deep into space using a huge telescope.
As soon as science extends beyond the laboratory, it ceases to be a science.
Science, I was not engaged in so serious to tell how it looks inside.
I speak of a shared vision of human goals and achieve them abstract.
How do you know all this vyshenapisannoe refers to how a person can realize the need to be honest.
Have you noticed that we are moving deeper into the matter, as it were?
Deep into human nature?
If you are reading these lines you may be wondering what is written here.
In this book, there is no practical advice on building corporate alignment of the vertical or the discovery that it is not open.
It’s clear.
All of this is actually very low.
Do not you do it.
Seriously not worth it.
If you have at least a minimal opportunity to not get involved in these desires do not go.
The Company will be a while you get used to criticize but then.
Because you’re going to deal with than such that nobody can imagine.
Go tell the person on the street is that having children is actually observed in certain thoughts you are born.
Well tell or pseudo-science is what happens in the laboratory and not in practice in the implementation.
He, too, you would not understand.
The Company may not be willing to pay you for what you just sit in his laboratory.
May be.
Seek solutions.
But do not confuse what is a pure desire for something with other desires.
Always understand what you want now people around.
Is it true that they want power?
Or they do the theory of power?
Or do they want money?
And they write books on management?
There are two dimensions of what is said to be honest.
There is always something that relates to your relationships with others.
There is always something that relates to your relationship with yourself.
I remember his previous psychologist.
I think he was obviously a drug addict and crazy.
He believed that if a person is engaged in clarifying things inside yourself without regard to others it is diagnosed.
Now I have the best psychologist in Moscow.
I always have the best people around.
It would be nice to understand what I am the best.
Because there is always someone who is the best.
Let’s just say… Moscow is not always the case.
And for that, I do not like Moscow.
I like to look at how to develop a system-wide world.
Assume the best college world?
Best hotel?
In Moscow, the 5 most popular hotels and this fucked up.
It should not be.
This confuses.
And they really are the best.
I do when I have to choose where to spend the next lecture every time I can not choose.
You know, I remember at one time wanted to give a lecture at the hotels are not the best.
So people do not come.
Or they come but were so inadequate to the situation that my guards bring me back door.
Shoot them in the hotels can not.
Or all at once.
I will not name names but it certainly looks funny but if a person spent 20—25 years, a desire to make a better