Butterflies and Moths (British). Furneaux William Samuel
Читать онлайн книгу.
insects that possess certain features in common by which they may all be distinguished from the members of any other family.
The British species represent eight families. They are as follows:
1. Papilionidæ.– Containing only one British species – the beautiful Swallow-tail (Plate I, fig. 1).
2. Pieridæ.– Containing ten species. These are often known collectively as the 'Whites,' but include four butterflies that are distinguished by beautiful shades of yellow and orange.
3. Nymphalidæ.– This family contains seventeen insects, among them being several splendid species. It includes the Fritillaries and Vanessas.
4. Apaturidæ.– Of this we have only one representative – the Purple Emperor (Plate V, fig. 1).
5. Satyridæ.– Including the 'Browns' and 'Heaths,' and numbering eleven species.
6. Lycænidæ.– Including the Hairstreaks, 'Coppers,' and 'Blues,' in all seventeen species.
7. Erycinidæ.– Containing only the 'Duke of Burgundy.'
8. Hesperiidæ.– This family contains seven British butterflies commonly known as the 'Skippers.'
Although all the members of the same family resemble each other in certain points of structure, or in their habits, yet we can often find among them a smaller group differing from all the others in one or two minor particulars. Such smaller groups are called Genera.
To make this all quite clear we will take an example.
The Brimstone Butterfly (Plate II, fig. 4) belongs to the second family —Pieridæ, all the members of which are distinguished from those of the other families by the characteristics mentioned on page 141.
But our Brimstone Butterfly possesses another very prominent feature in which it differs from all the other British Pieridæ, and that is the conspicuous projecting angles of both fore and hind wings. Among the foreign species of the family we are considering there are several that possess these angles; but as there are no others among our own members, the 'Brimstone' is placed by itself in the list of British Lepidoptera as the only member of the genus Gonopteryx or 'angle-winged' butterflies.
Thus the full relationship of this butterfly to other insects may be shown in the following manner:
The Brimstone Butterfly.
ORDER.—Lepidoptera
Section.—Rhopalocera
Family. —Pieridæ
Genus.—Gonopteryx
Species. —Rhamni
Now, every butterfly has a Latin or Greek name in addition to that by which it is popularly known. I should have said two Latin or Greek names. The first of these is always the generic name, and the second is the one by which we denote the particular member or species of that genus. Thus, the scientific name of the Brimstone Butterfly is Gonopteryx Rhamni.
'But,' the reader may be inclined to ask, 'why should we not be satisfied with the one popular name only?' And, 'If we must have a separate scientific name, could we not find suitable terms among our English words to build up such a name – one that might express the principal characteristics of the insect, and also serve all the purposes of classification?'
Such questions sound very reasonable, and so they are. But the entomologist's answer is this. We ourselves may get on well without the help of the dead languages, but we have brother naturalists all over the world, speaking a great variety of different languages. We endeavour to help one another – to exchange notes and generally to assist one another in our labours; and this can be greatly facilitated if we all adopt the same system of nomenclature. The educated of most of the great nations generally know something of Latin and Greek, and consequently the adoption of these languages is generally acceptable to all.
This sounds well, but for my own part I believe that if we are to make any branch of natural history a popular study, especially with the young, we must to a certain extent avoid anything that may prove distasteful. There is no doubt whatever that many a youngster has been turned away from the pursuit of the study of nature by the formidable array of almost unpronounceable names that stretch nearly halfway across a page; and those who desire to make such a study pleasant to beginners should be very cautious with the use of these necessary evils. One would think, on glancing over some of the scientific manuals that are written 'especially for the young,' that the authors considered our own too mean a language for so exalted a purpose, for in such works we find all or nearly all the popular names by which the schoolboy knows certain creatures he has seen entirely omitted, and the description of a species appended to a long Latin term that conveys no idea whatever to the reader, who is studying the description of a well-known animal or plant and doesn't know it.
Our plan will be to give the popular names throughout, except in the case of those few species that are not so well known as to have received one; but the scientific names will always be given as well for the benefit of those readers who would like to know them. And the short description of the method of classification just given will enable the more ambitious of my readers to thoroughly understand the table of British butterflies and moths toward the end of the book.
This table includes all the British species of butterflies and of the larger moths; and the arrangement is such as to show clearly the divisions into sections, families, &c. It will therefore be of great value for reference, and as a guide for the arrangement of the specimens in the cabinet.
In the foregoing description of the method of classification butterflies only are mentioned; but the division and arrangement of moths is carried out in just the same manner except that the system is a little more complicated. The number of moths is so large in comparison, that we are able to select from them some very large groups the species of which possess features in common. These groups are termed tribes, and are again divided into families just like the butterflies. Thus the arrangement of moths includes tribes, families, genera and species. We will take an example by way of illustration as we did before, and ask the reader to verify the same by comparison with our table:
Example.– The 'Common Tiger' (Plate X, fig. 3).
ORDER.—Lepidoptera
Section.—Heterocera
TRIBE. —Bombyces
Family. —Cheloniidæ
Genus.—Arctia
Species. —Caia
Scientific Name. —Arctia Caia.
I have already said that the Latin and Greek names of butterflies and moths are not at all necessary to the young entomologist. It is quite possible to be well acquainted with the natural history of these creatures, and to derive all the pleasure and benefits that the study of them can afford without the knowledge of such names; but most entomologists go in for them, often to the entire exclusion of the popular English terms.
There are those who consider themselves (or would have us consider them) expert entomologists because they have the power to vomit forth a long list of scientific names of butterflies and moths which (to them) have no meaning whatever; and it is astonishing that we meet with so many youngsters who can rattle away such terms, and, at the same time, are totally ignorant of the real nature of the creatures they name.
If you wish to be a naturalist in the true sense of the term, study your specimens, and take but little pains to commit their hard names to memory; and you will then find that the latter will gradually become your own property without any special effort on your part. Your continued reference to illustrated works and museum