The Power of the Herd. Linda Kohanov
Читать онлайн книгу.
— or more likely may not — have everyone’s best interests in mind.
And yet, after centuries of rampant destruction, profiteering, slavery, and genocide, here comes George Washington, a man who kept his sensitivity intact on the battlefield, tempering great passion, power, ambition, and fierceness with personal restraint, adaptability, equanimity, and empathy. “Let your heart feel for the affliction, and distresses of every one,” he advised.
That is true courage. That is mature leadership.
That is evolution.
The human psyche is a dynamic ecosystem. Without the right balance of day and night, sunshine and rain, predator and prey, culture and nature, a landscape originally designed to support life turns into a desert, a dust bowl, an apocalyptic, postnuclear nightmare of desolation and alienation. In symbolic terms, daylight represents conscious awareness: what we can see and name, predict and command. Much of that “other 90 percent” operates subconsciously or unconsciously, moving stealthily through the night, resisting full explanation and domestication. Yet people don’t just shy away from darkness in favor of the light. Some odd quirk of human behavior forces each generation to relive the fall of Adam and Eve in all kinds of crafty, covert ways.
Scientists and atheists are not immune. Practical modern minds tend to glorify what is “light” — that which is logical, socially acceptable, profitable, and/or controllable. Anything outside each person’s current worldview is shrouded in darkness — not just unknown, not just suspect, but damned. This includes forms of perception. If you’re fanatically religious, you’re likely to revere faith and submission to established theological doctrine while distrusting reason, intuition, and feeling. If you’re a genetic researcher, on the other hand, you’re much more apt to promote reason and established scientific doctrine while discounting faith, feeling, and intuition. Either way, significant forms of nonverbal awareness are outlawed, remaining grossly underdeveloped. Families, tribes, and religious and political organizations accentuate this self-limiting tendency, socializing members to accept a particular set of static judgments, inspiring people to smugly dismiss, actively ostracize, threaten, or even kill those who operate from a different perspective.
No wonder so many of us reach middle age thirsting for something indescribable while feeling frightened or guilty about it. We’ve been reared by a culture of desert dwellers: obsessive, rain-phobic sun worshippers who shine massive spotlights at the stars to chase away the night. The mysterious, nourishing waters of emotion, empathy, instinct, artistic and mythic insight, gut feelings, and intersubjective awareness have all but dried up in many schools and professions. And it promises to get worse in the information age. After all, how do you quantify love or tweet your deepest, most elusive dreams?
To people who aren’t particularly religious, the fall of Adam and Eve may seem like a quaint little folktale, but it’s actually a brilliant teaching story, a perceptive, richly nuanced assessment of the flaw behind all human flaws: the premature acquisition of the knowledge of good and evil. The first man and woman, as you may recall, ate the forbidden fruit and were promptly expelled from paradise. But debates about why a benevolent God would put that disturbing tree in the garden usually ignore the possibility that it was planted for some future use: that the fruit would swell to ripeness as humanity itself matured.
Newly created and innocent to the core, Adam and Eve simply couldn’t fathom the master plan of a fluid, multifaceted intelligence. From their pristine, undeveloped consciousness, parental cautions to stay away from that one compelling tree sounded stern and arbitrary. And so, like a couple of curious five-year-olds with no impulse control, they tasted the bitter knowledge of good and evil, resulting in the uniquely human compulsion to judge everything as either innately right or wrong, useful or useless, blessed or sinful.
Then, of course, they looked for someone else to blame. Adam complained that the woman tempted him to disobey God. And Eve became the first human to claim that “the devil made me do it.” Waves of fear and shame followed these stunned, overstimulated little creatures out of Eden, leaving their descendants to manage the divine gift of judgment from a confused, hopelessly dualistic, dangerously limited point of view.
Historically and across all cultures, groups of people mutually reinforce the tendency to deny wholeness in favor of the light, forgetting that God is not the sun but the one who invented day and night, sound and silence, form and formlessness, freedom and restraint, male and female, heaven and earth, and a host of other opposites as tools of the creator’s trade. Adventurous souls sometimes plunge into darkness, engaging in obsessively hedonistic, risky, or outright criminal behavior as a form of rebellion, but here again they fail to achieve balance — and usually look for a scapegoat (society, parents, divorce, drugs, or alcohol) to blame for their destructive, shortsighted ways. Only by exploring and integrating light and dark, spirit and matter, verbal and nonverbal awareness, predatory and nonpredatory power can we ever hope to reach our true potential.
I’m not saying anything new here. Thousands of books on psychology, mythology, art, religion, and symbolism explore ways to access parts of the mind that elude logic and language yet still prove essential to mental and emotional health. What I’m excavating in this brief history of power involves a lesser-known aspect of the optimally functioning psyche, one that has been repeatedly, sometimes dramatically, brought to our attention — then promptly ignored — for at least the past twenty-five hundred years. I’m talking about the inner, redemptive relationship between predator and prey, and, more specifically, the cultivation of nonpredatory wisdom as a key to, perhaps even a mandate of, human evolution.
Natural Horsemanship
I don’t think I would have grasped the importance of the predator/prey dynamic had I not been investigating horse-training techniques in the early 1990s. Around that time, a small group of Western cowboys were actively bucking the system, promoting empathy and respect for the horse’s perspective over traditional rough-riding, bronc-breaking practices. Through their increasingly popular books, videos, and public exhibitions, innovators like Bill and Tom Dorrance, Ray Hunt, Buck Brannaman, Pat Parelli, and Monty Roberts came to be known as founders of the “natural horsemanship” movement, influencing a new generation of trainers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Regardless of the individual methods these men created, a core principle they all share involves the notion that humans are predators and horses are prey animals. Difficulties arise when people unconsciously act predatory with animals designed to flee large cats and packs of wolves. The intensity of our gaze alone can be unnerving. Horses have eyes on the sides of their heads, emphasizing peripheral vision, while humans, like lions, look directly ahead, reinforcing a goal-oriented perspective originally designed for stalking. Some trainers also insist that, to horses, we move around in a perpetual rearing position, poised for attack with our grasping, clawlike hands. And we smell like what we eat: meat.
In the 1970s, when I was investigating vegetarianism, I read a number of books making the opposite case. Human physiology, they said, proved that meat eating was unnatural for us. After all, we have no fangs, and our nails can’t rip through paper, let alone flesh. With the teeth and digestive system of an herbivore, we have to cook our steaks and cut them into bite-size portions. Some of us suffer colon cancer for our carnivorous sins.
The simple truth of the matter is that we are omnivores, with characteristics of both predator and prey. As a result, we all have Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde moments as we struggle to bring these opposites into balance. The problem is that we’ve grown up in a culture of conquerors, where predatory behavior is reinforced in school and rewarded in business. Those who refuse to claw their way to the top often have trouble imagining an alternative, because the “wisdom of the prey” has been educated right out of them. Some accept the role of victim simply because they can’t stomach becoming a tyrant.
Horses have much to teach us about the middle ground between submission and aggression. They’re not cowardly