Before AIDS. Katie Batza

Читать онлайн книгу.

Before AIDS - Katie Batza


Скачать книгу
and research efforts, the meanings of sexuality and health within both gay political and mainstream medical communities changed significantly over the course of the 1970s. Finally, a substantial and multifaceted gay medical infrastructure predated the AIDS crisis of the 1980s, a fact that is, with few exceptions, overlooked in the vast literature on AIDS (not to mention my initial daydreamed history of gay community health clinics). This existing infrastructure made significant contributions to gay health and mainstream medicine in the 1970s and was well positioned to serve effectively on the frontlines of the early AIDS epidemic of the 1980s.

      CHAPTER 1

      REIMAGINING GAY LIBERATION

      Arising in the late 1960s, gay liberation sparked the exponential growth of gay institutions and services, including those for health. As a movement, gay liberation championed and personified a militant gay and lesbian politics that redirected the blame for homosexual oppression to society rather than to homosexuals themselves and celebrated gay and lesbian sexuality. Taking advantage of diminished policing of gay spaces and a larger political context that challenged the status quo, gay liberation embraced the concept of “gay is good,” a complete shift from earlier political and medical framings of homosexuality. The movement also witnessed the proliferation of businesses, newspapers, and social outlets by and for gay communities in cities across the country. Nevertheless, it was local politics, activists, and contexts that directed the evolution of these services and institutions more than any national gay liberation movement or politics. Indeed, the gay health activism of the 1970s demonstrates that gay liberation played, at times, only a minor role in the development of gay health services and the resulting gay institutions.

      Among gay health activists and in the clinics they started, gay liberation rarely conformed to the imagined history common in today’s LGBTQ communities, which homogenizes and romanticizes 1970s gay experiences by suggesting that gay urban communities across the country acted similarly, held shared beliefs, and deployed common tactics to fight the same battles. Gay liberation as a cultural and political movement mattered as gay communities began to take on new shapes and meanings in the 1970s, and gay health activism does not discount its significance. The history of gay health activism, however, demands a reimagining of gay liberation, replacing the national movement with local examples of vaguely similar rhetoric sculpted by local contexts. This new vantage point provides a richer and more accurate understanding of the meanings of gay liberation while also revealing that many organizations and services that came to epitomize gay liberation were only gay through circumstance.

       “Already Part of the We”

      In Boston, gay liberation appears as only a tangential factor in the Fenway clinic’s origins and early growth. Rather, it was locally oriented opposition to gentrification that unified the neighborhood and propelled its activism. After the city approved the Boston Redevelopment Authority’s Fenway Urban Renewal Project in 1965 and began razing portions of the neighborhood in late 1967, local residents created a wide array of social services to unify the community and resist the Redevelopment Authority’s plan.1 Along with a food co-op, a newspaper, a childcare center, and a community playground, a small clinic emerged as yet another form of resistance through community building. The thinking behind these enterprises was simple: if the Boston Redevelopment Authority wanted to redevelop the neighborhood through razing, residents sought to revitalize the neighborhood themselves, eliminating the need to raze. They took advantage of federal funding through Great Society programs and deftly used photo opportunities and political optics to make destroying the neighborhood unsavory for local politicians. Thus, on a summer evening in 1971, the first in a long line of Fenway residents in need of medical care arrived at the Boston Center for Older Americans, a senior drop-in center located on the neighborhood’s eastern edge operated by the First Church of Christ, Scientist. Clinic cofounder David Scondras had decided to use the center’s space for an after-hours community clinic despite the Christian Science church’s teachings that members should maintain their physical and mental health through the use of prayer rather than medicine. Unbeknownst to center management or church officials and with the Black Panther Clinic as a model, Scondras, with the help of nursing graduate student and Fenway resident Linda Beane, began offering health services to Fenway residents, including gay-friendly VD testing to the resident gay community.2

      Scondras, a recent Harvard graduate, antiwar activist, and computer pro grammer, had come to live in the neighborhood while working as an economics instructor at Northeastern University on the neighborhood’s eastern border. In the Fenway, he continued his work in the antiwar movement that had begun at Harvard and took the job at the Center for Older Americans as a way to get to know neighborhood residents. At Northeastern, the young instructor and political activist with a bushy black beard befriended Beane, who led a student group that was dedicated to the community health movement and provided free medical care. A fellow Fenway resident and also a veteran of the antiwar movement, Beane applied her political acumen to neighborhood issues, including organizing Fenway residents at the area’s Westland Avenue Community Center.3

      Tensions with the Church of Christ, Scientist and the rapidly increasing number of patients made it impossible for the Fenway clinic to operate out of the Boston Center for Older Americans for long. As a result, in early 1973, the group found and rented the basement of a small building, “a defunct antique shop,” with an alleyway entrance off Haviland Street in the heart of the Fenway neighborhood, to house a new community clinic.4 The basement on Haviland Street was a far cry from a clinic at the time Scondras rented it. As one activist reminisced in an interview, “They got my brother-in-law to be their pro-bono lawyer who got them their lease for a dollar a year.”5 Community members cleaned and painted the abandoned basement and constructed makeshift exam rooms, a filing area, a waiting room, and a lab. One remembered, “I helped with some of the physical stuff when they were building, putting some of the flooring down and things like that, which was all done by probably some people who knew what they were doing and most people who didn’t and were just helping.”6 They furnished the clinic with a hodgepodge of secondhand and donated furniture, including seats from a defunct movie theater on Boylston Street that served as waiting room chairs and medical equipment from a retired Back Bay doctor, and opened the clinic’s doors to the community in August 1973.7 Medical supplies were often “acquired” by volunteers who were also physician’s assistants, nurses, doctors, or medical students dedicated to providing free health care. A longtime volunteer physician at the Fenway clinic remembered, “I’d filch stuff from the hospital and bring it over.”8 Nearly everything in the clinic was borrowed, used, or homemade, but from its opening, it was busy serving the Fenway residents who oftentimes had limited or no access to other health care.

Image

      Figure 3. The initial main entrance to the Fenway Community Health Center was in an alleyway off a side street in the heart of the Fenway neighborhood. Fenway Community Health Center records, 1972–2007, M172, box 10, folder 27, Northeastern University Archives, Boston.

      Far from being focused on the gay population, the Fenway Community Health Clinic, both in its nascent stage at the Boston Center for Older Americans and in its first official home in the basement on Haviland, reflected and served, according to its patient demographics, the diverse neighborhood residents. A third of the Fenway population lived below the poverty level, scraping by with a median annual income of $2,027.9 One reporter writing in 1977 described the area as a “low-income, low-rent neighborhood, its population of 4,000 is somewhat transient, consisting mainly of students, welfare families, young working people, and elderly people. It has long had a reputation for street crime, drugs, and prostitution and was once one of Boston’s more notorious red-light districts.”10 In a city infamous for its racial segregation and tension during the 1970s, the Fenway was a rare example of integration of not only blacks and whites but also a considerable immigrant, mostly Latino, population. Responding to the neighborhood’s needs, the clinic treated almost all nonemergency medical issues, from child immunizations, blood pressure tests, and the flu to testing and treating VD, pre- and postoperative care for most surgeries, and gynecological services.11 A longtime volunteer


Скачать книгу