Environmental Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Читать онлайн книгу.
16. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental finance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
17. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
18. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental finance?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope?
<--- Score
21. Will a Environmental finance production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
22. What are the Environmental finance use cases?
<--- Score
23. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
24. Is there a clear Environmental finance case definition?
<--- Score
25. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental finance leverage and how?
<--- Score
26. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
27. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
28. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
29. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental finance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
30. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
31. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
32. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
33. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
35. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
36. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
37. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
38. What are (control) requirements for Environmental finance Information?
<--- Score
39. Do you have a Environmental finance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
40. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental finance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
41. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
42. Why are you doing Environmental finance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
43. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
44. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental finance results are met?
<--- Score
45. Is Environmental finance required?
<--- Score
46. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
47. Is special Environmental finance user knowledge required?
<--- Score
48. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
49. Is the Environmental finance scope manageable?
<--- Score
50. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
51. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental finance results?
<--- Score
52. Are the Environmental finance requirements testable?
<--- Score
53. How do you manage changes in Environmental finance requirements?
<--- Score
54. How have you defined all Environmental finance requirements first?
<--- Score
55. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
56. What is in scope?
<--- Score
57. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
58. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
59. Who approved the Environmental finance scope?
<--- Score
60. Has the Environmental finance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
61. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
62. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
63. Do you all define Environmental finance in the same way?
<--- Score
64. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. What system do you use for gathering Environmental finance information?
<--- Score
66. Is Environmental finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
68. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
71. Is Environmental finance currently on schedule according to the plan?