Process Intensification and Integration for Sustainable Design. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн книгу.

Process Intensification and Integration for Sustainable Design - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу

      Feed flow rate is a standard vapor volumetric flow rate.

      Table 2.D.2 Makeup composition.

Stream Water (mass%) MDEA (mass%) Piperazine (mass%)
18 – Makeup 55 40 5.0

      Table 2.D.3 Key heat exchange equipment outlet temperatures.

Stream T (°F)
8 210
22 110 a

      a Set at 10 °F warmer than inlet gas.

      Abbreviations

AFC annualized fixed cost (depreciation)
AOC annual operating cost
Btu British thermal unit
CO2 carbon dioxide
images purchased cost of equipment q
FCI fixed capital investment
FCIi fixed capital investment for a given processing unit
FCIS salvage value of the fixed capital investment
ΔFLmix average explosiveness of a mixture
images Hand factor for equipment q
gal gallons
GJ gigajoules
h hours
H2S hydrogen sulfide
HA high acid
HVm average mass heating value
IROI incremental return on investment
kWh kilowatt hours
lb pounds
LFLmix lower flammability level of a mixture
images mass flow rate
MDEA methyl diethanolamine
MM$ million dollars
MMBtu million British thermal units
MMSCFD million standard cubic feet per day
MSCF thousand standard cubic feet
N plant lifetime (number of years)
N2 nitrogen
NGL natural gas liquid
N np number of non‐particulate processing steps
N OL number of operators per shift
P number of processing steps where particulate solids are handled
P average pressure
PRI process route index
psig pounds per square inch of gauge pressure
return on investment
SCF standard cubic feet
TAC total annualized cost
TEG triethylene glycol
TCI total capital investment
ΔTCI change in total capital investment for a given additional case
UFLmix upper flammability limit of a mixture
VCi total variable cost for each process unit
WCI working capital investment
yr years
ρ average fluid density

      1 1 Al‐Douri, A., Sengupta, D., and El‐Halwagi, M.M. (2017). Shale gas monetization – a review of downstream processing to chemicals and fuels. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 45: 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.05.016.

      2 2 WVU. (2016) Uncoventional resources. http://pages.geo.wvu.edu/∼jtoro/Petroleum/24_Unconventional-1.pdf (accessed 08 January 2017).

      3 3 Hill, R.J., Jarvie, D.M., Zumberge, J. et al. (2007). Oil and gas geochemistry and petroleum systems of the fort worth basin. AAPG Bulletin 91: 456–457. https://doi.org/10.1306/11030606014.

      4 4


Скачать книгу