The Politics of Immigration (2nd Edition). David Wilson
Читать онлайн книгу.
out, or stop taking a full course load.38
There are also visa categories for exchange visitors, athletes, artists, entertainers, religious workers, “intracompany transferees,” and others.39
Once immigrants have been here a while, can’t they “get legal”?
Millions of immigrants have lived in the United States for many years without status and are eager to gain legal permanent residency. According to a survey by Bendixen & Associates in October 2005, 98 percent of the undocumented would try to get legal status if it was available to them.40 Those who have a valid option for legalizing their status generally pursue it, even though the process can be expensive and can take years. In 2013, a total of 530,802 people—including documented and undocumented immigrants—managed to adjust their status to permanent resident, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).41
But there are only a few ways to “get legal,” and most out-of-status immigrants don’t qualify. The process is difficult for people who entered the United States with visas (or under the visa waiver program) but stayed longer than allowed. It’s close to impossible for people who came here without permission—“entered without inspection” (EWI) in immigration law jargon.
Even marrying a U.S. citizen doesn’t usually help immigrants who entered without inspection. Instead of applying to adjust their status here, they must leave and apply for a visa from outside the United States. Once out of the country, they are trapped by the punitive provisions of Section 301 in the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. Under those provisions, anyone who has been “unlawfully present” in the United States for more than 180 days is deemed “inadmissible” and barred from returning for three years; anyone with more than twelve months of “unlawful presence” is barred for ten years. If you can prove that your absence will cause your U.S. citizen spouse to suffer “extreme hardship,” you can apply for a “provisional unlawful presence waiver” that may allow you to return to the United States sooner. Starting in 2013 people married to U.S. citizens could apply for this waiver while remaining in the United States.42
Is it ever easy to get a green card?
If you entered the United States with a valid temporary visa but overstayed it, you might be able to get permanent residency through family ties or employer sponsorship. If you overstayed more than 180 days, you’d technically be subject to the three-year or ten-year bars, but if you’re married to a U.S. citizen you can generally avoid the bars by adjusting your status in the United States.43
Still, getting a green card is rarely easy, even for immigrants who haven’t overstayed their temporary visas. Any encounter with the immigration bureaucracy is likely to be plagued with obstacles and frustrations.
Many people believe that getting a green card through marriage is just a matter of filling out a few forms and answering a few questions—as long as the relationship is legitimate. But the way the government looks at it, the burden is on you—the applicant—to prove your marriage isn’t fraudulent. You and your spouse are expected to get a joint checking account, pay taxes jointly, and have bills and leases in both your names, among other steps (even though not all married couples routinely do these things).44 The whole process from marriage to green card generally takes at least ten months if you’re married to a U.S. citizen, but it can take longer. The process is much longer if the spouse sponsoring you is a permanent resident rather than a citizen.45
Before July 1, 2013, there was no way for a U.S. citizen to sponsor a same-sex spouse. After the Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in June 2013, the administration of President Barack Obama changed its policy and instructed federal employees “to review immigration visa petitions filed on behalf of a same-sex spouse in the same manner as those filed on behalf of an opposite-sex spouse.”46
Getting an employer to sponsor you for permanent residency is especially complicated, and can often take more than five years. Employers are frequently reluctant to go along with the tax and salary requirements involved and prefer not to admit they’ve been hiring out-of-status workers. Before your file even gets to the immigration agency, the Department of Labor must certify that your employer tried unsuccessfully to find U.S. citizens or permanent residents who could do your job.47 Although discrimination on the basis of national origin is illegal in the United States, a 2014 study of approval rates for labor certification petitions found significant disparities based on the nationality of the prospective employee, even when other factors like skills and experience were the same.48
What about the “anchor babies”?
Children born in the United States are U.S. citizens, even if their parents are out-of-status immigrants. Opponents of immigration like to call such children “anchor babies,” implying that immigrant parents use their U.S.-born children as a way to establish themselves here. In July 2010 Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) claimed on Fox News that unauthorized women come to the United States simply to “drop and leave” their babies.49
Most citizen children of undocumented immigrants are actually born some time after their parents have settled in the United States, according to a study of babies born to immigrants from March 2009 to March 2010. Just 9 percent of the out-of-status parents had arrived in 2008 or later; most had been in the United States for a number of years when the babies were born—30 percent had arrived between 2004 and 2007, and 61 percent arrived before 2004. For its October 2006 survey, Bendixen & Associates asked undocumented immigrants to give their reasons for migrating to the United States. The respondents overwhelmingly cited work opportunities; having “anchor babies” didn’t even rate a mention.50
In any case, having a U.S. citizen child doesn’t help undocumented immigrants gain legal status, or even protect them from deportation. U.S. citizens have to be at least twenty-one years old to sponsor their parents for legal residency. Each year, thousands of people who have U.S.-born children are deported, leaving families shattered. A 2012 study by the New York University School of Law’s Immigrant Rights Clinic found that 87 percent of New York City immigration cases involving parents of U.S. citizen children between 2005 and 2010 ended in deportation.51
Before 1996, out-of-status immigrants could sometimes win “suspension of deportation” by proving that they had lived in the United States for seven years and had good moral character, and that their removal would cause “extreme” hardship to themselves or to a family member with legal status. But IIRIRA, the 1996 immigration law, changed the rules. To be granted what is now called “cancellation of removal,” applicants must prove they have lived here for ten years with good moral character, and their deportation would cause “exceptional and extremely unusual” hardship to a U.S. citizen or permanent resident parent, spouse, or child. It’s very difficult to meet the hardship criteria: a child who is separated from a parent clearly suffers hardship, but the situation is not necessarily exceptional or extremely unusual. When such cancellation is granted, it usually goes to an immigrant parent who is the primary caregiver for a U.S. citizen child suffering from a severe, life-threatening medical condition.52
The 1996 law also set a limit of 4,000 on the number of people who can be granted this particular type of cancellation in any given year—not counting permanent residents seeking to reverse deportation orders, who are counted separately and are not subject to the cap. Complicated rules designed to prevent judges from granting more than 4,000 cancellations in any given year have resulted in a backlog of decisions.53
BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
Some countries base citizenship on family heritage, but the British colonies followed English common law in automatically making people citizens of the place where they were born. The newly formed United States continued to recognize birthright citizenship; the Supreme Court assumed it as the basis for an 1804 decision.
However, women didn’t have full citizenship until they won the right to vote in 1920, and many states originally denied voting rights to citizens without