The History of the Abolition of African Slave-Trade by the British Parliament. Thomas Clarkson

Читать онлайн книгу.

The History of the Abolition of African Slave-Trade by the British Parliament - Thomas Clarkson


Скачать книгу
him we owe it, that we no longer see our public papers polluted by hateful advertisements of the sale of the human species, or that we are no longer distressed by the perusal of impious rewards for bringing back the poor and the helpless into slavery, or that we are prohibited the disgusting spectacle of seeing man bought by his fellow-man. To him, in short, we owe this restoration of the beauty of our constitution — this prevention of the continuance of our national disgrace.

      I shall say but little more of Mr. Sharp at present, than that he felt it his duty, immediately after the trial, to write to Lord North, then principal minister of state, warning him in the most earnest manner, to abolish immediately both the trade and the slavery of the human species in all the British dominions, as utterly irreconcileable with the principles of the British constitution, and the established religion of the land.

      Among other coadjutors, whom the cruel and wicked practices which have now been so amply detailed brought forward, was a worthy clergyman, whose name I have not yet been able to learn. He endeavoured to interest the public feeling in behalf of the injured Africans, by writing an epilogue to the Padlock, in which Mungo appeared as a black servant. This epilogue is so appropriate to the case, that I cannot but give it to the reader. Mungo enters, and thus addresses the audience: —

      Thank you, my massas! have you laugh your fill?

       Then let me speak, nor take that freedom ill.

       E'en from my tongue some heart-felt truths may fall, And outraged Nature claims the care of all. My tale in any place would force a tear, But calls for stronger, deeper feelings here; For whilst I tread the free-born British land, Whilst now before me crowded Britons stand, — Vain, vain that glorious privilege to me, I am a slave, where all things else are free.

      Yet was I born, as you are, no man's slave,

       An heir to all that liberal Nature gave;

       My mind can reason, and my limbs can move

       The same as yours; like yours my heart can love;

       Alike my body food and sleep sustain;

       And e'en like yours — feels pleasure, want, and pain.

       One sun rolls o'er us, common skies surround;

       One globe supports us, and one grave must bound.

      Why then am I devoid of all to live

       That manly comforts to a man can give?

      To live — untaught religion's soothing balm,

       Or life's choice arts; to live — unknown the calm,

       Of soft domestic ease; those sweets of life,

       The duteous offspring, and th' endearing wife?

       To live — to property and rights unknown,

       Not e'en the common benefits my own!

       No arm to guard me from Oppression's rod,

       My will subservient to a tyrant's nod!

       No gentle hand, when life is in decay,

       To soothe my pains, and charm my cares away;

       But helpless left to quit the horrid stage,

       Harassed in youth, and desolate in age!

      But I was born in Afric's tawny strand,

       And you in fair Britannia's fairer land;

       Comes freedom, then, from colour? — Blush with shame!

       And let strong Nature's crimson mark your blame.

       I speak to Britons. — Britons — then behold

       A man by, Britons snared, and seized, and sold! And yet no British statute damns the deed, Nor do the more than murderous villains bleed.

      O sons of Freedom! equalize your laws,

       Be all consistent, plead the negro's cause;

       That all the nations in your code may see

       The British negro, like the Briton, free.

       But, should he supplicate your laws in vain,

       To break, for ever, this disgraceful chain,

       At least, let gentle usage so abate

       The galling terrors of its passing state,

       That he may share kind Heaven's all social plan;

       For, though no Briton, Mungo is — a man.

      I may now add, that few theatrical pieces had a greater run than the Padlock; and that this epilogue, which was attached to it soon after it came out, procured a good deal of feeling for the unfortunate sufferers, whose cause it was intended to serve.

      Another coadjutor, to whom these cruel and wicked practices gave birth, was Thomas Day, the celebrated author of Sandford and Merton, and whose virtues were well known among those who had the happiness of his friendship. In the year 1773 he published a poem, which he wrote expressly in behalf of the oppressed Africans. He gave it the name of The Dying Negro. The preface to it was written in an able manner by his friend Counsellor Bicknell, who is therefore to be ranked among the coadjutors in this great cause. The poem was founded on a simple fact, which had taken place a year or two before. A poor negro had been seized in London, and forcibly put on board a ship, where he destroyed himself, rather than return to the land of slavery. To the poem is affixed a frontispiece, in which the negro is represented. He is made to stand in an attitude of the most earnest address to heaven, in the course of which, with the fatal dagger in his hand, he breaks forth in the following words:

      To you this unpolluted blood I pour,

       To you that spirit, which ye gave, restore.

      This poem, which was the first ever written expressly on the subject, was read extensively; and it added to the sympathy in favour of suffering humanity, which was now beginning to show itself in the kingdom.

      About this time the first edition of the Essay an Truth made its appearance in the world. Dr. Beattie took an opportunity, in this work, of vindicating the intellectual powers of the Africans from the aspersions of Hume, and of condemning their slavery as a barbarous piece of policy, and as inconsistent with the free and generous spirit of the British nation.

      In the year 1774, John Wesley, the celebrated divine, to whose pious labours the religious world will long be indebted, undertook the cause of the poor Africans. He had been in America, and had seen and pitied their hard condition. The work which he gave to the world in consequence, was entitled Thoughts on Slavery. Mr. Wesley had this great cause much at heart, and frequently recommended it to the support of those who attended his useful ministry.

      In the year 1776, the Abbé Proyart brought out, at Paris, his History of Loango, and other kingdoms in Africa, in which he did ample justice to the moral and intellectual character of the natives there.

      The same year produced two new friends in England, in the same cause, but in a line in which no one had yet moved. David Hartley, then a member of parliament for Hull, and the son of Dr. Hartley who wrote the Essay on Man, found it impossible any longer to pass over without notice the case of the oppressed Africans. He had long felt for their wretched condition, and, availing himself of his legislative situation, he made a motion in the House of Commons, "That the Slave Trade was contrary to the laws of God, and the rights of men." In order that he might interest the members as much as possible in his motion, he had previously obtained some of the chains in use in this cruel traffic, and had laid them upon the table of the House of Commons. His motion was seconded by that great patriot and philanthropist, Sir George Saville. But though I am now to state that it failed, I cannot but consider it as a matter of pleasing reflection, that this great subject was first introduced into parliament by those who were worthy of it; by those who had clean hands and an irreproachable character, and to whom no motive of party or faction could be imputed, but only such as must have arisen from a love of justice, a true feeling of humanity, and a proper sense of religion.

      About this time two others, men of great talents and learning, promoted the


Скачать книгу