Spatial Multidimensional Cooperative Transmission Theories And Key Technologies. Lin Bai

Читать онлайн книгу.

Spatial Multidimensional Cooperative Transmission Theories And Key Technologies - Lin Bai


Скачать книгу
asymptotic array gain of the dominant eigenmode transmission (when MT and MR are large) is given by

figure

      Finally, the diversity gain has upper and lower bounds at high SNR7 (Chernoff bound is a good approximation of SER at high SNR)

figure

      It means that the error rate is a function of the SNR and the slope of the curve is MTMR. The full diversity gain MTMR is obtained by the dominant eigenmode transmission.

      (2) The dominant eigenmode transmission with antenna selection

      The principle of the dominant eigenmode transmission with antenna selection is as follows. First, the matrix set H′ consisting of figure columns of matrix H is removed according to the definition. The set of all possible H′ is S{H′}, and its potential is figure. At each instantaneous time, the selection algorithm uses the matrix to provide the largest singular value figure for a dominant eigenmode transmission. Therefore, the output SNR becomes

figure

      The average SNR can be calculated according to the method provided in Ref. 7, and the corresponding array gain is

figure

      where

figure

      where aS is the coefficient of um of figure.

      Similar to the traditional dominant eigenmode transmission, if all transmit antennas are used, the antenna selection algorithm can obtain the same diversity gain, which means the diversity gain is MTMR.

      (3) Multi-eigenmode transmission

      The eigenmode transmission will not achieve multiplexing gain when the same symbol is sent to all transmit antennas. As an alternative, the system throughput can be increased by maximizing spatial multiplexing gain. For this purpose, the symbols are spread over the non-zero eigenmode of all channels. Assuming MRMT, the channel matrix is an independent and identically distributed Rayleigh channel, and singular value decomposition is made for the channel matrix by Eq. (2.125). If the transmitter uses the precoding matrix VH to multiply the input vector c(MT × 1) and the receiver uses matrix figure to multiply the received vector, the input–output relationship can be written as

figure

      It can be seen that the channel has been decomposed into MT parallel SISO channels given by {σ1, . . . , σnt}. It should be noted that if MT virtual data channels are established, all of these channels will be fully decoupled. Therefore, the mutual information of the MIMO channel is the sum of the SISO channel capacities.

figure

      where {p1, . . . , pMT} is the eigenmode power allocation for each channel, satisfying the normalization condition figure. The capacity is linear with MT, so the spatial multiplexing gain is equal to MT. This transmission mode might not achieve full diversity gain MTMR, but at least provides a MR-times array and diversity gain. Multi-eigenmode transmission can also be combined with antenna selection at the receiving end. As long as figureMT, the multiplexing gain is still MT, but the array gain and diversity gain are reduced.

      2.3.4.2MIMO system without transmit channel information

      When the transmitter has no channel information, multiple antennas can be used at the transmitter and receiver ends to achieve diversity and increase the system capacity. This can be realized by spreading the symbols over the antenna (space) and time using the so-called space–time coding. In the following, the space–time block code will be briefly introduced.

      Similar to MISO system, two symbols c1 and c2 are simultaneously transmitted from antenna 1 and antenna 2 in the first symbol period, and the symbols –figure and figure are transmitted from antenna 1 and antenna 2 in the next symbol period.

      Assuming that the flat fading channel remains unchanged in the two consecutive symbol periods, the 2 × 2 channel matrix can be expressed as

figure

      It is worth noting that the subscripts here represent the receive and transmit antenna labels instead of the symbol periods. The signal vector received by the receiving array in the first symbol period is

figure

      The signal vector received in the second symbol period is

figure

      where n1 and n2 are additive noise components per symbol period of the receive antenna array (the subscripts represent symbol periods instead of antenna labels). Therefore, the receiver produces a mixed signal vector

figure

      Similar to the MISO system, two symbols c1 and c2 are transmitted during two symbol periods of two transmit antennas. Therefore, matrix Heff is orthogonal to all channel information, namely figure.

      If figure, then

figure

      where n′ satisfies E{n′} = 02×1 and figure. The above equation shows that the transmission of the symbols c1 and c2 is completely decoupled, which means

figure

      The average output SNR is

figure
Скачать книгу