Coal-Fired Power Generation Handbook. James G. Speight

Читать онлайн книгу.

Coal-Fired Power Generation Handbook - James G. Speight


Скачать книгу
to the plant from the mine, such as the length of time that the coal is exposed to the atmosphere during transportation. Additional factors such as crushed run of mine size and specific handling procedures also impact the degradation process. Additional decomposition occurs during handling and storage in a pile and bunker, bin, or silo. The root cause of the degradation is believed loss of moisture that impacts the coal both mechanically and chemically, through the generation of additional surface reaction area (Hossfeld and Hatt, 2006).

      On the other hand some steam coals, especially the harder ones (low Hardgrove index), and some coals produced from surface mines have smaller quantities of the –100 mesh size. In many plants there is such a small quantity of the -100 mesh size that this material is sent to disposal and is considered uneconomical to recover.

      Coal flotation is a physiochemical process which exploits the differences in the wettability of hydrophobic clean coal and that of hydrophilic foreign particles (Arnold and Aplan, 1989; Fecko et al., 2005). It is, therefore, subject to the surface properties of coal pyrite and other types of commercially worthless material present in coal which plays a major role in determining separation of such material from coal (Luttrell and Yoon, 1994; Luttrell et al., 1994).

      Oxidation also leads to the formation of various oxygen functional groups and soluble inorganic that can adsorb on the coal surface and modify its wettability and floatability. These groups have remarkable impacts on surface charge, which controls film-thinning process and thus flotation kinetics (Sokolović et al., 2006). Decreased coal recovery and increased concentrate ash content may be explained by oxidation of coal. In fact, a good correlation exists between the zeta potential and floatability and electrochemical tests confirm the negative effect of oxidation on the coal recovery and also the final effect of coal flotation process (Fonseca et al., 1993; Sokolović et al., 2006).

      The scheme used in physical coal cleaning processes varies among coal cleaning plants but can generally be divided into four basic phases: (i) initial preparation, (ii) fine coal processing, (iii) coarse coal processing, and (iv) final preparation (Figure 3.1).

      For most coal-fired power plants, coal is prepared for use by first crushing the delivered coal into pieces less than 5 cm in size. The crushed coal is then transported from the storage yard to in-plant storage silos by rubberized conveyor belts. In the initial preparation phase of coal cleaning, the raw coal is unloaded, stored, conveyed, crushed, and classified by screening into coarse and fine coal fractions. The size fractions are then conveyed to their respective cleaning processes.

      In plants that burn pulverized coal, coal from the storage silos is fed into pulverizing units that grind the crushed coal into the consistency of talcum and mix it with primary combustion air which transports the pulverized coal to the steam generator furnace (Chapters 7, 8). A 500 MW coal-fired power plant will have approximately six such pulverizing units, five of which will supply the steam generator at full load with approximately 225 tons per hour. In plants that do not burn pulverized coal, the crushed coal may be directly fed into cyclone burners, a specific kind of combustor that can efficiently burn larger pieces of coal (Chapters 7, 8). In plants fueled with slurried coal, the slurry is fed directly to the pulverizing units and then mixed with air and fed to the steam generator. The slurry water is separated and removed during pulverizing of the coal.

      Fine coal processing and coarse coal processing use similar operations and equipment to separate the contaminants. The primary difference is the severity of operating parameters. The majority of coal cleaning processes use upward currents or pulses of a fluid such as water to fluidize a bed of crushed coal and impurities. The lighter coal particles rise and are removed from the top of the bed. The heavier impurities are removed from the bottom. Coal cleaned in the wet processes then must be dried in the final preparation processes.

      Final preparation processes are used to remove moisture from coal, thereby reducing freezing problems and weight and raising the heating value. The first processing step is dewatering, in which a major portion of the water is removed by the use of screens, thickeners, and cyclones (Hee and Laskowski, 1994; Nowak, 1994). The second step is normally thermal drying, achieved by any one of three dryer types: (i) fluidized bed drying, (ii) flash drying, and (iii) multi-louvered drying. In the fluidized bed dryer, the coal is suspended and dried above a perforated plate by rising hot gases. In the flash dryer, coal is fed into a stream of hot gases for instantaneous drying. The dried coal and wet gases are both drawn up a drying column and into a cyclone for separation. In the multi-louvered dryer, hot gases are passed through a falling curtain of coal, which is then raised by flights of a specially designed conveyor.

      Although inherent moisture cannot be changed, the surface moisture can be reduced to any level that is economically practicable. Considerations include the possibility of re- exposure to moisture during transportation and subsequent storage and the fact that intense thermal drying increases ideal conditions for re-adsorption of moisture.

      Foreign metals can be removed relatively easily. Most wood fragments can be removed although a few small pieces of wood cause no particular harm because they are combustible.

      Thus, coal preparation is, of necessity, an integral part of the production and use of coals. The effect on costs can be as important as the planning of mine layouts; decisions concerning mining systems should be an essential element in all mining feasibility studies, especially in view of new (and/or renewed) environmental regulations such as the Clean Air Act Amendments in the United States (Elliott, 1992; Tumati and DeVito, 1992; Rosendale et al., 1993; Paul et al., 1994).

Level Raw coal weight (%) Raw coal content (%) Reduction potential
Скачать книгу