A Companion to Documentary Film History. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн книгу.

A Companion to Documentary Film History - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Film,” The (Biloxi, Mississippi) Daily Herald, 12 July 1951.

      31 31 Stuart J. Seborer, “Annual Report of Stateside Activities Supporting the Reorientation Program in Japan and the Ryukyu Islands.” October 1950. Reorientation Branch, Office for Occupied Areas. Office of the Secretary of the Army. Washington, DC.

      32 32 Ibid.

      33 33 See Immerwah (2015) and Sackley (2011).

      34 34 For example, the production of The Cummington Story became an important episode in the town’s local history. See Richie Davis, “The Cummington Story,” Greenfield (MA) Recorder. 30 April 2005. http://www.recorder.com/richie‐s‐top‐40‐cummington‐4080218

      35 35 In recent years moving image archivists from NARA have started placing online high‐resolution digital scans of government films, including A Town Solves A Problem (1950) and The Cummington Story (1945).

      Paul Fileri

       American University

      In the decade following World War II, a fraction of independent documentary cinema on the left emerged from struggles over decolonization within western European empires. This current appears now as a scattered set of projects all designed to make new sense, in moving image and sound, of the crisis in relations among territory, public, race, nation, and empire that anticolonial political movements continued to raise. In the context of the French colonial empire, documentary cinema registered in its formal innovations and public controversies the emergence of new possibilities for social and political transformation. The most radical work did so by confronting how colonial state regulations and cultural institutions policed the production and circulation of documentary cinema. And at its most incisive, this documentary work openly addressed the imperial political order straining to uphold stable administrative and political divisions between the metropolitan center (representing a ruling continental nation of France, identified with mainland Europe territory) and colonial overseas territories. For its makers and critics, documentary filmmaking offered a way to cut across boundaries that sought to keep metropolitan space and time distinct and apart from colonial geographies and histories.

      René Vautier and Paulin Vieyra each published autobiographical accounts of their early documentary efforts and their confrontations with colonial authorities, and they often credit themselves with originating particular forms of anticolonial filmmaking that adopt the perspectives of respectively French metropolitan citizens or colonized subjects. Their own insistent activities of critical self‐definition indicate the deepening fault lines over cultural identity and belonging that emerged at a time when political mobilizations and social and intellectual movements began to dismantle prevailing colonial‐era articulations of race, nation, and empire. In retrospect, each project attests to an attempt to imagine a political future that would overcome the metropolitan domination of colonial territory and colonized peoples. These films have been at once singled out and marginalized, but their important position within documentary film history is revealed when we pay attention to their different inscriptions within African and French film histories.


Скачать книгу