Политическая наука №4 / 2016. Государства в современном мире: Новые подходы к исследованию. Коллектив авторов
Читать онлайн книгу.
стран) // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. – М., 2012. – № 4. – С. 83–105.
Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. Траектории режимных трансформаций и типы государственной состоятельности // Полис: Политические исследования. – М., 2012. – № 2. – С. 8–30.
Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. «Царь горы», или Почему в посткоммунистических автократиях плохие институты // Полис: Политические исследования. – М., 2013. – № 2. – С. 125–142.
Политический атлас современности: Опыт многомерного статистического анализа политических систем современных государств / А.Ю. Мельвиль, М.В. Ильин, Е.Ю. Мелешкина, М.Г. Миронюк, Ю.А. Полунин, Н.И. Тимофеев. – М.: Изд-во «МГИМО-Университет», 2007. – 272 с.
Adizes I. The ideal executive: Why you cannot be one and what to do about it: A new paradigm for management. – Santa Barbara, CA, 2004. – Mode of access: http://www.adizes.com/wp-content/uploads/The_Ideal_Executive_Sample_CH.pdf (Дата посещения: 25.07.2016).
Bäck H., Hadenius A. Democracy and state capacity: Exploring a J-shaped relationship // Governance. – L., 2008. – Vol. 21, N 1. – P. 1–24.
Berman S. The Vain hope for «correct» timing // Journal of Democracy. – Baltimore, 2007. – Vol. 18, N 3. – P. 14–17.
Besley T.J., Kudamatsu M. Making Autocracy Work // Institutions and economic performance / E. Helpman (ed.). – Harvard: Harvard univ. press, 2009. – P. 452–510.
Besley T., Persson T. State capacity, conflict, and development // Econometrica. – N.Y., 2010. – Vol. 78, N 1. – P. 1–34.
Besley T., Persson T. The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics // The American economic review. – Pittsburgh, 2009. – Vol. 99, N 4. – P. 1218–1244.
Boix C., Svolik M.W. The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships // The Journal of Politics. – Chicago, 2013. – Vol. 75, N 2. – P. 300–316.
Bolt J., Zanden J.L. The Maddison project: Collaborative research on historical national accounts // The Economic history review. – Glasgow, 2014. – Vol. 67, N 3. – P. 627–651.
Bratton M., Chang E.C. C. State building and democratization in sub-saharan Africa forwards, backwards, or together? // Comparative political studies. – Thousand Oaks, 2006. – Vol. 39, N 9. – P. 1059–1083.
Carbone G., Memoli V. Does democratization foster state consolidation? A panel analysis of the ‘Backward Hypothesis’: Unpublished paper – 2012. – Mode of access: http://www.sociol.unimi.it/papers/2012-04-19_G.%20Carbone%20e%20V.%20Memoli.pdf (Дата посещения: 08.08.2016.)
Cárdenas M. State capacity in Latin America // Economía. – Washington, 2010. – Vol. 10, N 2. – P. 1–45.
Charron N., Lapuente V. Does democracy produce quality of government? // European journal of political research. – Hoboken, 2010. – Vol. 49, N 4. – P. 443–470.
Cingranelli D.L., Richards D.L. The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) human rights data project // Human rights quarterly. – Baltimore, 2010. – Vol. 32, N 2. – P. 401–424.
Clague C. Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies // Journal of economic growth. – Berlin, 1996. – Vol. 1, N 2. – P. 243–276.
D’Arcy M., Nistotskaya M. State first, then democracy: Using cadastral records to explain governmental performance in public goods provision. – Gothenburg, 2015. – Vol. 2015, N 11. – 30 p. (QoG Working Paper Series.)
Data // The quality of government institute. – 2015. – Mode of access: http://qog.pol.gu.se/data (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
Edin M. State capacity and local agent control in china: CCP cadre management from a township perspective // The China Quarterly. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. – Vol. 173. – P. 35–52.
Evans P.B., Rueschemeyer D., Skocpol T. Bringing the state back in. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1985. – 404 p.
Feenstra R.C., Inklaar R., Timmer M.P. The next generation of the penn world table // The American economic review. – Pittsburgh, 2015. – Vol. 105, N 10. – P. 3150–3182.
Fjelde H., De Soysa I. Coercion, co-optation, or cooperation? State capacity and the risk of civil war, 1961–2004 // Conflict management and peace science. – Thousand Oaks, 2009. – Vol. 26, N 1. – P. 5–25.
Fortin J. A tool to evaluate state capacity in post-communist countries, 1989–2006 // European journal of political research. – Hoboken, 2010. – Vol. 49, N 5. – P. 654–686.
Fortin J. Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries // Comparative political studies. – Thousand Oaks, 2012. – Vol. 45, N 7. – P. 903–930.
Fortin-Rittberger J. Exploring the relationship between infrastructural and coercive state capacity // Democratization. – L.: Taylor & Francis, 2014. – Vol. 21, N 7. – P. 1244–1264.
Global country status overview, FIW 1973–2015 // Freedom House. – 2015. – Mode of access: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Global_Country_Status_Overview_1973-2015.pdf (Дата посещения: 07.08.2016.)
Frye T. Building states and markets after communism: the perils of polarized democracy. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. – 314 p.
Fukuyama F. Liberalism versus state-building // Journal of democracy. – Baltimore, 2007. – Vol. 18, N 3. – P. 10–13.
Fukuyama F. State-building: Governance and world order in the 21 st century. – Ithaka: Cornell univ. press, 2004 a. – 160 p.
Fukuyama F. The imperative of state-building // Journal of Democracy. – Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 2004 b. – Vol. 15, N 2. – P. 17–31.
Gandhi J., Przeworski A. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats // Comparative Political Studies. – Thousand Oaks, 2007. – Vol. 40, N 11. – P. 1279–1301.
Gehlbach S. Representation