Risk Assessment. Georgi Popov
Читать онлайн книгу.
In the Z590.3 standard, this statement is made (p. 23). “As a practical matter, having knowledge of three risk assessment concepts will be sufficient to address most, but not all risk assessment situations” (that safety professions will face). They are Preliminary Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment; the What‐If/Checklist Analysis Methods; and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis.
1.5 ANSI B11.0 – 2020: Safety of Machinery
This Is a Standard of Major Importance
Because of the breadth of its coverage, ANSI B11.0 – 2020 is of particular importance for machinery safety. Several parts of the standard are duplicated here with permission from B11 Standards Inc. As is said in the Forward,
This standard specifies general safety requirements for the design, construction, operation and maintenance (including installation, dismantling and transport) of machinery and machinery systems. This standard also applies to devices that are integral to these machines. (p. 8)
This author believes that every safety professional who is involved in machinery safety should have a copy of this standard. It is supported by the standard known as ANSI B11.19‐2019, the title of which is “Performance Requirements for Risk Reduction Measures: Safeguarding and other Means of Reducing Risk.” This is a 231‐page document that is devoted to means of risk reduction. This is the stated Purpose of B11.0‐2020:
This standard describes procedures for identifying hazards, assessing risks, and reducing risks to an acceptable level over the life cycle of machinery. (p. 9)
The objective of the B11 series of standards:
Is to eliminate injuries to personnel from machinery or machinery systems by establishing requirements for the design, construction, reconstruction, modification, installation, set‐up, operation and maintenance of machinery or machine systems. This standard should be used by suppliers and users, as well as by the appropriate authority having jurisdiction. (p. 9)
The standard includes an explicit requirement that machinery suppliers, reconstructors, modifiers, and users achieve acceptable risk levels.
ANSI B11.0 is the most comprehensive standard outlining the risk assessment process currently applicable to machinery for all of the operational categories just previously mentioned. Recognition is given to the Prevention through Design concept in the Forward.
Prevention Through Design or PtD is a recent term in the industry; the objectives of risk assessment, risk reduction and elimination of hazards as early as possible are integral and not new to this standard. The phrase “Prevention Through Design” is used within the standard, as are other equivalent terms such as “elimination by design,” “design out,” and “substitution” to thoroughly address risk assessment and applying it to the lifecycle and operations of the machine. (p. 8)
Because many American makers of machinery sell their goods to other countries, there was a need for harmonization with other applicable standards. This sentence follows the caption Harmonization.
This standard has been harmonized with international (ISO) and European (EN) standards by the introduction of hazard identification and risk assessment as the principal method for analyzing hazards to personnel to achieve a level of acceptable risk.
That statement presents an interesting and weighty concept. If all safety professionals accept that hazard identification and analysis and risk assessment are the first steps in preventing injuries to personnel, a major concept change in the practice of safety will have been achieved.
This is how acceptable risk is defined in the standard – Definitions (p. 18):
Acceptable risk: A risk level achieved after risk reduction measures have been applied. It is a risk level that is accepted for a given task (hazardous situation) or hazard. For the purpose of this standard, the terms “acceptable risk” and “tolerable risk” are considered to be synonymous.
Informative Note 1: The expression “acceptable risk” usually, but not always, refers to the level at which further technologically, functionally and financially feasible risk reduction measures or additional expenditure(s) of resources will not result in significant reduction in risk. The decision to accept (tolerate) a risk is influenced by many factors including the culture, technological and economic feasibility of installing additional risk reduction measures, the degree of protection achieved through the use of additional risk reduction measures, and the regulatory requirements or best industry practice.
Informative Note 2: The user and supplier may have different level(s) of acceptable risk.
Informative Note 3: A similar phraseology used in some ISO standards is as follows: “the risk has been adequately reduced.”
A particularly outlined risk assessment process is included on B11.0‐2020. It is duplicated here to emphasize several purposes: it is illustrative although it differs from other outlines, it indicates that people involved in the process should be qualified, the scope of the risk assessment exercise is to be defined, hazards are to be identified and analyzed, initial risks are to be assesses, risks are to be reduced if necessary, and acceptable risk levels are to be achieved.