Intelligent Systems for Rehabilitation Engineering. Группа авторов
Читать онлайн книгу.Area of rehabilitation robotics explored
1.2.7 Assistive Robotic Systems
The importance of socially assistive robots was presented, which entertained the patients socially whenever they required [63]. For motivating, monitoring, and reminding stroke patients, an assistive robotic system was described, which also tracked the arm activity of the patient [64]. The cognitive strategy was extended with rehabilitation robotics by testing the Active Learning Program for Stroke (ALPS) [65]. Socially assistive robotics (SAR) was tested, and their kinematic and temporal features, which were related to fatigue, were determined [66].
1.2.8 Limb Injury
Importance of development of rehabilitation robotics for the patients who suffered from upper limbs impairment was highlighted [67]. An application of wireless sensing technology in rehabilitation robotics was presented for patients who had upper limb injury due to stroke [68]. For the rehabilitation of upper limb injury patients, a task-oriented robotic system ADAPT was designed, and its performance was evaluated [69].
1.2.9 Motion Detection
Patients who suffer from any kind of impairment are not able to produce proper movement. The robotic systems may help in determining their intention of motion and aid it by helping them to move. Production of torque in the desired direction and compensation of kinetic and breakaway friction was presented [70]. Investigation of support vector machine (SVM) identified the sEMG signals from the muscles and produced motion in that direction [71]. A method enhancing the degree of freedom of the patient and supporting the motion was developed. It was tested on ARM in III robotic system [72]. Based on the EMG signals produced by muscles, the torque and intention of motion were determined [73]. The visualization for the intention estimation algorithm is denoted by Figure 1.2 for inquisitive readers.
Figure 1.2 Block diagram representation of the intention estimation algorithm.
The intended motion of hand for hemiparetic hand patients was done using sEMG signals. It was introduced in the form of a soft glove [74].
1.3 Discussions and Future Scope of Work
The research focusing on workstation adaptations of rehabilitation robotics is mentioned in [75]. Rehabilitation game was integrated with robotics based on reinforcement learning method and depending on the skills of the player. The difficulty level of the game was increased gradually as per the skills of player [76]. A system was designed for adjusting the difficulty of game based on the score produced by the player [77]. A diagrammatic representation of the difficulty adjustment in games as per the flow model is provided with the help of Figure 1.3.
The works carried out then in Europe on rehabilitation robotics were summarized, and historical aspects and EU’s different funded and active projects were also summarized [78]. The projects that were carried out on rehabilitation robotics in North America were described, and they were judged as success or failure [79]. A summary of the project carried out jointly by VA and Stanford University was examined, and all the pros and cons of the project were listed [80]. Table 1.4 showcases a list of certain areas that have the potential future scope as well.
Figure 1.3 The difficulty adjustment in games according to the flow model.
Table 1.4 List of some works done in areas with potential future.
Ref. number | Area of rehabilitation robotics explored | Remarks |
[14] | Gentle/G system for patients with brain injury | The design, control, and application of an experimental setup were presented for the rehabilitation. The robot had six active and three passive degrees of freedom. |
[24] | Virtual Gait Rehabilitation Robotics (ViGRR) | A novel concept for rehabilitation robotics; its insights were based on ViGRR and did not require any therapist. |
[33] | VR in rehabilitation robotics | Approaches made to cure neurologically disordered patients, and the importance of exercises by clinical robots was presented. |
[41] | Mechatronic rehabilitation robotics | A systems approach, mobility sensors, cost/benefit ratio, and softness were discussed. The importance of softness was also discussed and was considered as an important factor. |
[65] |
Robotic-assisted |