Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage. Группа авторов
Читать онлайн книгу.
a time interval, 15 June 2012 to 23 September 2014, prior to the start of injection. Monitoring sites and reference region “R” are plotted in black. Points P1–P9 experiencing fast ground deformation are plotted in red. SAR intensity image is exposed in background in regions of low coherence.
Elastic and poroelastic modeling were performed to simulate the ground deformation that would be caused by CO2 injection rates of 1,500 tonnes/day (i.e., the maximum expected rate) at a depth of 3,150 – 3,350 m (Samsonov et al., 2015). Elastic modeling with a point source model (Mogi, 1958) suggests a constant annual uplift rate of about 1.6 cm/year and east‐west motion of up to 0.6 cm/year. However, poroelastic modeling suggests that uplift will reach its maximum value of about 1.6 cm near the injection site almost immediately after the start of injection but its spatial extent will continue to increase during the entire modeled injection period of 25 yr. Horizontal motion calculated by the poroelastic model does not exceed 0.1 cm but forms a very broad pattern, extending 40 km from the injection well. The poroelastic model better represents the constitutive properties of the fluid‐filled porous rocks and the nature of the injection process, and is considered to be more realistic than the elastic model. Comparison of the poroelastic model predictions of ground deformation with the measurement precision (95% confidence interval) of the deformation maps, which does not exceed 0.3 and 0.2 cm/year, suggests that only the vertical motion will be detectable.
Figure 2.12 Two components of displacement associated with point P2 from Figure 2.10. This location is not far from the injection site and has experienced some deformation prior to injection.
2.4.3. Illinois Basin Decatur Project, USA
The Illinois Basin Decatur Project, started in November 2011, is a multiyear program managed by Archer Daniels Midland, the U. S. Department of Energy, the Illinois State Geological Survey, and Schlumberger Carbon Services. This is the only carbon capture and storage effort in the United States that is currently injecting large volumes of greenhouse gas emissions into a regional deep saline formation (Finley et al., 2011, 2013). The injection, from an ethanol production facility, started at a rate of 1,000 metric tons/day and is planned to increase to over 2,000 metric tons/day. The super‐critical CO2 is stored in the 550 m thick Mount Simon sandstone at a depth of 2.1 km. The overlying Eau Claire shale forms a 100 – 150 m thick seal. The Mount Simon formation was the site of a functioning natural gas storage facility and has performed well in that capability. Several different geochemical, geophysical, and remote sensing technologies are employed at the site to monitor the evolution of the injected volume of carbon dioxide. Preliminary results from microseismic and InSAR monitoring have been reported by Kaven et al. (2014) and Falorni et al. (2014), respectively.
The injection site is situated in a mixture of industrial sites, farmland, forest, and residential areas and InSAR monitoring can be challenging in such a diverse environment. The SqueeSAR algorithm described in section 2.2.3, with its combination of permanent or persistent scatterers (PS) and distributed scatterers (DS), is a flexible method for treating such a wide variety of land surfaces. The distribution of the approximately 109,000 scatterers found in the region surrounding the injection well (Falorni et all 2014) is shown in Figure 2.13.
Another difficulty is introduced by the seasonal and atmospheric conditions, including long periods of snow cover in this part of the world. Some permanent scatterers such as steep roofs and tall towers may not accumulate much snow, but large areas will be covered, reducing the coherence and introducing significant variations to the characteristics of the scattering surface. Artificial reflectors, man‐made, stable targets designed to remain free of snow, are one remedy and are commonly used in areas prone to snowfall. In order to provide for year‐round coverage, 21 artificial reflectors, spaced 75 m apart, were constructed and emplaced in an open area close to the injection well‐pad (Fig. 2.13). All 21 reflectors were found to have strong and stable reflectivity, both for ascending and descending satellite orbits.
The acquisition of COSMO‐SkyMed X‐band data began in July 2011, before the start of injection in November. Falorni et al. (2014) have reported on roughly 2 yr of observations from July 2011 until June 2013. They note that there is little or no ground motion associated with the start of injection with the exception of two points. For example, a time series consisting of the average range change from all 21 reflectors is plotted in Figure 2.14. The two points showing some movement correlating with the start of injection (Fig . 2.15) were in the vicinity of the injection well and may reflect some movement related to the pressurization of the well bore itself.
The lack of injection‐related surface deformation is an expected result. Due to the high permeability and thickness of the reservoir sandstone, the bottom hole pressure has changed very little during the injection. Barring any unforeseen geologic features, such as an unmapped fracture zone, the carbon dioxide is expected to migrate outward into the reservoir without generating a large pressure change and associated deformation. The InSAR observations serve to verify the expected performance of the sequestration effort and to detect any deformation that may imply the upward movement of the carbon dioxide.
Figure 2.13 (a) Distribution of scatterers in the region surrounding the injection well (magenta star), roughly 4,000 per square kilometer. (b) Close‐up view of the region surrounding the injection well‐pad. The grid of artificial reflectors is visible to the northwest of the wellhead.
(From Monitoring the Deformation Associated with the Geological Storage of CO2 by Donald W. Vasco. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480724.007.)
Figure 2.14 Average range change from the 21 artificial reflectors installed just to the northwest of the injection well site. The start of injection is indicated by the vertical blue line.
(From Falorni, G., Hsiao, V., Iannaconne, J., Morgan, J., & Michaud, J.‐S. (2014). InSAR monitoring of ground deformation at the Illinois Basin Decatur Project. In Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geological Formations, Volume 4, CPL Press.)
Figure 2.15 Time series of two measurement points in the vicinity of the injection well. The vertical blue line indicates the start of injection.
(From Falorni, G., Hsiao, V., Iannaconne, J., Morgan, J., & Michaud, J.‐S. (2014). InSAR monitoring of ground deformation at the Illinois Basin Decatur Project. In Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geological Formations, Volume 4, CPL Press.)
2.5.