The Essential Works of George Rawlinson: Egypt, The Kings of Israel and Judah, Phoenicia, Parthia, Chaldea, Assyria, Media, Babylon, Persia, Sasanian Empire & Herodotus' Histories. George Rawlinson
Читать онлайн книгу.
the representation in Perrot et Chipiez, Hist. de l’Art, iii. 73.]
1127 [ Döllinger, Judenthum und Heidenthum, i. 427.]
1128 [ Perrot et Chipiez, iii. 77.]
1129 [ Gen. xiv. 5.]
1130 [ Perrot et Chipiez, iii. 419, 450, 555, &c.]
1131 [ Ibid. p. 554.]
1132 [ Curtius, in the Archäologische Zeitung for 1869, p. 63.]
1133 [ Kenrick, Phoenicia, p. 303.]
1134 [ Menand. Ephes. Fr. 1.]
1135 [ See Philo Bybl. Fe. ii. 8, § 14; ’Όλων τον και Χρόνων. Damascius ap. Phot. Bibl. p. 1050.]
1136 [ Philo. Bybl. Fr. ii. 8, § 17.]
1137 [ Diod. Sic. xx. 14.]
1138 [ Philo Bybl. Fr. ii. 8, § 25.]
1139 [ Ibid. Fr. iv.]
1140 [ Ibid. Fr. ii. 8, § 14-19.]
1141 [ Karth or Kartha, is probably the root of Carthage, Carthagena, Carteia, &c., as Kiriath is of Kiriathaim, Kiriath-arba, Kiriath-arim, &c.]
1142 [ Melicertes is the son of Demaroüs and the grandson of Uranus; Baal-samin is a god who stands alone, “without father, without mother, without descent.”]
1143 [ See Perrot et Chipiez, Hist. de l’Art, iii. 567, 577, 578; Gesenius, Mon. Phoen. Tab. xxxvii. I.]
1144 [ Herod. ii. 44.]
1145 [ Ibid.]
1146 [ Strab. iii. 5, § 4-6.]
1147 [ Perrot et Chipiez, Hist. de l’Art, iii. 575.]
1148 [ Ibid. p. 574.]
1149 [ Strab. iii. 5, § 5.]
1150 [ Sil. Ital. iii. 18-20.]
1151 [ Ibid. iii. 21-27.]
1152 [ 1 Sam. v. 2-5; 1 Mac. x. 18.]
1153 [ Philo Bybl. Fr. ii. 8, § 14.]
1154 [ Ibid. § 20.]
1155 [ Layard, Ninev. and Bab. p. 343; Kenrick, Phoenicia, p. 323.]
1156 [ See 2 Sam. viii. 3, and 1 Kings xv. 18, where the names Hadad-ezer and Ben-hadad suggest at any rate the worship of Hadad.]
1157 [ Macrob. Saturnalia, i. 23.]
1158 [ So Macrobius, l.s.c. Compare the representations of the Egyptian Sun-God, Aten, in the sculpures of Amenhotep IV. (See the Story of Egypt, in G. Putnam’s Series, p. 225.)]
1159 [ The h in “Hadad” is he (חדד), but in chad it is heth (מיתוס). The derivation also leaves the reduplication of the
1160 [ Philo Bybl. Fr. ii. 24, § 1.]
1161 [ Zech. xii. 11.]
1162 [ 1 Kings i. 18; 2 Kings v. 18.]
1163 [ Kenrick, Phoenicia, p. 311.]