Lifespan. David Sinclair

Читать онлайн книгу.

Lifespan - David  Sinclair


Скачать книгу
and sex—the poor guy—and resolved to limit himself in each regard. The historical record is a bit vague on the details of his sex life after that fateful decision,110 but his diet and drinking habits have been well documented: he ate no more than twelve ounces of food and drank two glasses of wine each day.

      “I accustomed myself to the habit of never fully satisfying my appetite, either with eating or drinking,” Cornaro wrote in his First Discourse on the Temperate Life, “always leaving the table well able to take more.”111

      Cornaro’s discourses on the benefits of la vita sobria might have fallen into obscurity had he not provided such compelling personal proof that his advice had merit: he published his guidance when he was in his 80s, and in exceptional health, no less, and he died in 1566 at nearly (and some sources say more than) 100 years old.

      In more recent times, Professor Alexandre Guéniot, the president of the Paris Medical Academy just after the turn of the twentieth century, was famed for living on a restricted diet. It is said that his contemporaries mocked him—for there was no science at that time to back his suspicion that hunger would lead to good health, just his gut hunch—but he outlived them, one and all. He finally succumbed at the age of 102.

      The first modern scientific explorations of the lifelong effects of a severely restricted diet began during the last days of World War I. That’s when the longtime biochemical collaborators Lafayette Mendel and Thomas Osborne—the duo who had discovered vitamin A—discovered, along with researcher Edna Ferry, that female rats whose growth was stunted due to lack of food early in life lived much longer than those that ate plenty.112

      Picking up on that evidence in 1935, a now-famous Cornell University professor named Clive McCay demonstrated that rats fed a diet containing 20 percent indigestible cellulose—cardboard, essentially—lived significantly longer lives than those that were fed a typical lab diet. Studies conducted over the next eighty years demonstrated again and again that calorie restriction without malnutrition, or CR, leads to longevity for all sorts of life-forms. Hundreds of mouse studies have been done since to test the effects of calories on health and lifespan, mostly on male mice.

      Reducing calories works even in yeast. I first noticed this in the late 1990s. Cells fed with lower doses of glucose were living longer, and their DNA was exceptionally compact—significantly delaying the inevitable ERC accumulation, nucleolar explosion, and sterility.

      If this happened only in yeast, it would merely be interesting. But because we knew that rodents also lived longer when their food was restricted—and later learned that this was the case for fruit flies, as well113—it was apparent that this genetic program was very old, perhaps nearly as old as life itself.

      In animal studies, the key to engaging the sirtuin program appears to be keeping things on the razor’s edge through calorie restriction—just enough food to function in healthy ways and no more. This makes sense. It engages the survival circuit, telling longevity genes to do what they have been doing since primordial times: boost cellular defenses, keep organisms alive during times of adversity, ward off disease and deterioration, minimize epigenetic change, and slow down aging.

      But this has, for obvious reasons, proven a challenge to test on humans in a controlled scientific setting. Sadly, it’s not hard to find instances in which humans have had to go without food, but those periods are generally times in which food insecurity results in malnutrition, and it would be a challenge to keep a test group of humans on the razor’s edge for the long periods of time that would be required for comprehensive controlled studies.

      As far back as the 1970s, though, there have been observational studies that strongly suggested long-term calorie restriction could help humans live longer and healthier lives, too.

      In 1978 on the island of Okinawa, famed for its large number of centenarians, bioenergetics researcher Yasuo Kagawa learned that the total number of calories consumed by schoolchildren was less than two-thirds of what children were getting in mainland Japan. Adult Okinawans were also leaner, taking in about 20 percent fewer calories than their mainland counterparts. Kagawa noted that not only were the lifespans of Okinawans longer, but their healthspans were, too—with significantly less cerebral vascular disease, malignancy, and heart disease.114

      In the early 1990s, the Biosphere 2 research experiment provided another piece of evidence. For two years, from 1991 to 1993, eight people lived inside a three-acre, closed ecological dome in southern Arizona, where they were expected to be reliant on the food they were growing inside. Green thumbs they weren’t, though, and the food they farmed turned out to be insufficient to keep the participants on a typical diet. The lack of food wasn’t bad enough to result in malnutrition, but it did mean that the team members were frequently hungry.

      One of the prisoners (and by “prisoners” I mean “experimental subjects”) happened to be Roy Walford, a researcher from California whose studies on extending life in mice are still required reading for scientists entering the aging field. I have no reason to suspect that Walford sabotaged the crops, but the coincidence was rather fortuitous for his research; it gave him an opportunity to test his mouse-based findings on human subjects. Because they were thoroughly medically monitored before, during, and after their two-year stint inside the dome, the participants gave Walford and other researchers a unique opportunity to observe the numerous biological effects of calorie restriction. Tellingly, the biochemical changes they saw in their bodies closely mirrored those Walford had seen in his long-lived calorie-restricted mice, such as decreased body mass (15 to 20 percent), blood pressure (25 percent), blood sugar level (21 percent), and cholesterol levels (30 percent), among others.115

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

      1

      In a wide-ranging interview to promote his memoirs, Lanzmann said of his masterpiece film about the Holocaust, “I wanted to get as close as possible to death. No personal accounts are told in Shoah, no anecdotes. It’s only about death. The film is not about the survivors.” “‘Shoah’ Director Claude Lanzmann: ‘Death Has Always Been a Scandal,’” Spiegel, September 10, 2010, http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/shoah-director-claude-lanzmann-death-has-always-been-a-scandal-a-716722.html.

      2

      The study looked at three concepts about death that children come to understand before they are seven years old: irreversibility, nonfunctionality, and universality. M. W. Speece and S. B. Brent, “Children’s Understanding of Death: A Review of Three Components of a Death Concept,” Child Development 55, no. 5 (October 1984): 1671–86, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6510050.

      3

      The author attended the birth of her daughter’s first child along with her son-inlaw. R. M. Henig, “The Ecstasy and the Agony of Being a Grandmother,” New York


Скачать книгу

<p>110</p>

It seems likely that he had sex at least once again, as he had one daughter, Clara, with his wife, Veronica. L. Cornaro, Sure and Certain Methods of Attaining a Long and Healthful Life: With Means of Correcting a Bad Constitution, &c., https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=dul1.ark:/13960/t0dv2fm86;view=1up;seq=1.

<p>111</p>

There are other translations. This comes from the edition published in Milwaukee by William F. Butler in 1903.

<p>112</p>

A 3-year-old rat measured in terms of human lifespan would be akin to a 90-yearold human, according to a researcher quoted by the authors. One of their rats, raised on an experimental diet from 6 weeks of age, lived to 40 months, while of those rats raised on a normal diet, the oldest reached 34 months, with “less than a third of the rats in our colony … expected to live to be more than two years old.” T. B. Osborne, L. B. Mendel, and E. L. Ferry, “The Effect of Retardation of Growth upon the Breeding Period and Duration of Life of Rats,” Science 45, no. 1160 (March 23, 1917): 294–95, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/45/1160/294.

<p>113</p>

I. Bjedov, J. M. Toivonen, F. Kerr, et al., “Mechanisms of Life Span Extension by Rapamycin in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster,” Cell Metabolism 11, no. 1 (January 6, 2010): 35–46, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824086/.

<p>114</p>

Among Kagawa’s findings on the impact of Western diets on the Japanese were significant increases in colon and lung cancer and decreases in stomach and uterine cancers, although the subjects’ food consumption was still much smaller than that of Americans or Europeans. When he looked at the residents of Okinawa, they had “the lowest total energy, sugar and salt, and the smallest physique, but had healthy longevity and the highest centenarian rate.” Y. Kagawa, “Impact of Westernization on the Nutrition of Japanese: Changes in Physique, Cancer, Longevity and Centenarians,” Preventive Medicine 7, no. 2 (June 1978): 205–17, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0091743578902463.

<p>115</p>

Two of the authors of the report were themselves part of the crew who elected to be locked up inside the Biosphere for two years and live on a low-calorie diet, with just 12 percent protein and 11 percent fat in terms of calorie consumption. Despite this calorie restriction and a 17±5 percent weight loss, all eight crew members were healthy and highly active during the two-year period. R. L. Walford, D. Mock, R. Verdery, and T. MacCallum, “Calorie Restriction in Biosphere 2: Alterations in Physiologic, Hematologic, Hormonal, and Biochemical Parameters in Humans Restricted for a 2-Year Period,” Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 57, no. 6 (June 2002): 211–24, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12023257.