Organización industrial. Martin Peitz

Читать онлайн книгу.

Organización industrial - Martin  Peitz


Скачать книгу
T. F. y Reiss, P. C. (1990). Entry in monopoly markets. Review of Economic Studies 57: 531–553.

      Bresnahan, T. F. y Reiss, P. C. (1991). Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy 99: 977–1009.

      Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J. y Klemperer, P. (1985). Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. Journal of Political Economy 93: 488–511.

      Caves, R. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 1947–1982.

      Chamberlin, E. (1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      Cooper, T. (1986). Most-favored pricing policy and tacit collusion. Rand Journal of Economics 17: 377–388.

      Cournot, A. (1838). Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie de la Richesse. Paris: Calmann-Lévy (nueva edición 1974).

      Das, S. y Das, S. P. (1997). Dynamics of entry and exit of firms in the presence of entry adjustment costs. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: 217–241.

      Davidson, C. y Deneckere, R. (1986). Long-run competition in capacity, short-run competition in price, and the Cournot model. Rand Journal of Economics 17: 404–415. Dick, A. (2007).

      Market size, service quality and competition in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 49–81.

      Dixit, A. K. y Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67: 297–308.

      Dowrick, S. (1986). Von Stackelberg and Cournot duopoly: choosing roles. Rand Journal of Economics 17: 251–260.

      Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J. y Samuelson, L. (1988). Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. Rand Journal of Economics 19: 495–515.

      Edgeworth, F. (1897). La teoría pura del monopolio. Giornale degli economisti 40: 13–31. Reprinted in English as ‘The pure theory of monopoly’. En Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. I. London: Macmillan; pp. 111–142.

      Ellickson, P. (2007). Does Sutton apply to supermarkets? Rand Journal of Economics 38: 43–59.

      Etro, F. (2008). Stackelberg competition with endogenous entry. Economic Journal 118: 1670–1697.

      Gal-Or, E. (1985). First mover and second mover advantages. International Economic Review 26: 649–653.

      Hansen, R. G. (1988). Auctions with endogenous quantity. Rand Journal of Economics 19: 44–58.

      Hopenhayn, H. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in the long run. Econometrica 60: 1127–1150.

      Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

      Just, R. E. y Chern, W. E. (1980). Tomatoes, technology, and oligopsony. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 11: 584–602.

      Kreps, D. y Scheinkman, J. (1983). Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell Journal of Economics 14: 326–337.

      Levitan, R. y Shubik, M. (1972). Price duopoly and capacity constraints. International Economic Review 13: 111–122.

      Lau, L. J. (1982). On identifying the degree of competitiveness from industry price and output data. Economics Letters 10: 93–99.

      Lofaro, A. (2002). On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot competition under incomplete information. European Journal of Political Economy 18: 561–578.

      Lyons, B., Matraves, C. y Moffatt, P. (2001). Industrial concentration and market integration in the European Union. Economica 68: 1–26.

      Mailath, G. (1989). Simultaneous signaling in an oligopoly model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 417–427.

      Mankiw, N. G. y Whinston, M. D. (1986). Free entry and social inefficiency. Rand Journal of Economics 17: 48–58.

      Matraves, M. (1999). Market structure, R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 47: 169–194.

      Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725.

      Milgrom, P. y Roberts, J. (1990). Rationalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 58: 1255–1277.

      Perloff, J. M., Karp, L. S. y Golan, A. (2007). Estimating Market Power and Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Riordan, M. (1985). Imperfect information and dynamic conjectural variation. Rand Journal of Economics 16: 41–50.

      Robinson, W. T. y Chiang, J. (1996). Are Sutton’s predictions robust?: Empirical insights into advertising, R&D, and concentration. Journal of Industrial Economics 64: 389–408.

      Salop, S. (1979). Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 141–156.

      Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      Schmalensee, R. (1992). Sunk costs and market structure: A review article. Journal of Industrial Economics 40: 125–134.

      Shapiro, C. (1989). Theories of oligopoly behavior. En Schmalensee, R. y Willig, R. (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

      Singh, N. y Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics 15: 546–554.

      Spence, M. (1976). Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition. Review of Economic Studies 43: 217–235.

      Spulber, D. (1995). Bertrand competition when rivals’ costs are unknown. Journal of Industrial Economics 41: 1–11.

      Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

      Sutton, J. (2007). Market structure: Theory and evidence. En Armstrong, M. y Porter, R. (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

      Vives, X. (1990). Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 19: 305–321.

      Vives, X. (2005). Games with strategic complementarities: New applications to industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 625–637.

      von Stackelberg, H. (1934). Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Vienna: Springer.

      36 La única excepción fue el modelo de capacidad-después-precio.

      37 Ver los capítulos 18 y 19 para un análisis más completo de las patentes y la industria farmacéutica.

      38 Amir y Grilo (1999) muestran que la concavidad-log de la función de demanda (inversa) (esto es, independientemente de la función de costos) conduce por sí sola al ranking (4.2). Se necesitaría una demanda convexa-log y que la producción no tuviera costos para que al menos una empresa tuviera Image

      39 Aquí consideramos productos sustituibles, para los cuales las funciones de mejor respuesta tienen pendientes descendentes bajo competencia en cantidades (sustituibilidad estratégica) y ascendentes bajo competencia en precios (complementariedad


Скачать книгу